User talk:ApoieRacional: Difference between revisions

Hi,

I know you sent me an email, but I only have email enabled so that I can deal with administrative actions, and it is not enabled for general queries. As your question at my talk page, or here and we can discuss. Regards. — Whpq (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I conduct my editing and communications here on Wikipedia, and not through email. If you have a query, you can ask on my talk page. — Whpq (talk) 23:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Criticism of Apple Inc.. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I do not appreciate you dragging my name through the mud in an edit summary. If you have a problem with me, deal with it on my talk page. I will not hesitate to inform ANI if you continue to harass me. GSK (talk • edits) 21:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am really disappointed after telling you explicitly to resolve this with discussion on the article talk page and to not edit war, you immediately decide to edit war. — Whpq (talk) 02:18, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts (but never when editing articles). There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empagliflozin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EGFR and CKD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pralatrexate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nephropathic Cystinosis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Squawk7700 (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think this is the very first wiki-article, that I am making. I will work on it, when I have time. Would it be possible for other wiki-editors to contribute in the meantime? ApoieRacional (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing! When discussing health, please remember to cite high-quality medical sources like review articles, major textbooks, and statements by national or international health organizations. Other good sources can be found here and here. We also have a guide to editing medical articles at WP:MEDHOW.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or the WikiProject Medicine talk page! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I have also access to many pay-walled publication via my university library, which are not available via Wikipedia. Although people, who get Federal funding in the USA, are subject to Biden’s Open-access mandate, most other countries do not have similar policies, and a lot of research publications (reviews and original) are still behind paywalls. It seems, that you are from the EU. Does the EU have Open Access mandate policies similar to the USA? ApoieRacional (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ApoieRacional. The UK and the EU both have open access mandates too, similar the the US. Often, papers are open access but not easy to find, for instance in institutional repositories. The best way typically to find medical sources apart from clinical guidelines is to use PubMed, where you can filter papers from the last 5 years that are review papers. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for letting me know about the EU and UK practices.

I wrote the US Section here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open-access_mandate&section=7&veaction=editsource .

Someone else wrote the EU and Canadian sections.

Would you be comfortable with writing the UK section for this wiki-article?

I would like to write it myself, but I am totally unfamiliar with their practices,

and I do not feel qualified to make such contribution. ApoieRacional (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chronic kidney disease

added a link pointing to Jazan

Russian language

added a link pointing to Sentence

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Russian language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fast-neutron reactor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Jay8g. An edit that you recently made to Richard Sakwa seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay8g [V•T•E] 21:13, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I work with Generative Large Language Models as a part of my job, and I am well aware of their limitations, such as creating fake cited references by Grok (chatbot). Yes, I used a reputable AI bot to get the first draft of that addition, but I verified every reference and I changed ca. 1/3 of the original AI text to fix inaccuracies and to make it more human-like. Are we required to disclose the use of AI in our wiki-writing? ApoieRacional (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found that the use of AI is allowed in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AI-generated_content . Just because text seems to be “AI-generated” is not a valid reason for deletion.

The content I added is valid and supported by proper references. If you cannot point out specific problems with my text, please restore it. ApoieRacional (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s really not a valid interpretation of that essay, which also isn’t a policy. What it actually says is Often the use of such tools on Wikipedia may be discouraged due to the poor quality of the output from currently available technology. Clearly rewriting ca. 1/3 of the original AI text wasn’t enough to make it actually read like a Wikipedia article or otherwise non-AI. Did you not notice all of the random emojis it added?

If you’re going to use AI (which you really shouldn’t), you should expect to have to rewrite all of it since it really can’t handle encyclopedic writing or Wikipedia formatting. Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being civil in this conversation. I agree with you, that even expensive Generative Large Language Models are far from perfect nowadays. I would like to rewrite this article. Since I did not save my draft on my computer, I would have to restore my draft temporarily for 30 min, and copy it to my Sandbox. Please do not interfere for the next 30 min. In the meantime, I would really appreciate, if you can provide specific suggestions how to make this draft better. It seems, that we both agree, that this subject is worth expanding on. ApoieRacional (talk) 23:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t need to restore your revision, you can just open the editor from the diff and copy the wikisource of that revision. —Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

IgA nephropathy

added a link pointing to Genetic

Platinocyanide

added a link pointing to Electronic

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

added a link pointing to Human Rights Act

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – are you using AI tools for your recent edits here? If so, can you mention:

• What tool(s) you are using, and what version
• What prompts, features, workflow, etc. you are using
• What review, if any, you are doing of the output

Thank you! NicheSports (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do that. Although, I use AI’s only for the firsts drafts of larger artciles. I re-write everything myself, an I add my own references with EndNote. ApoieRacional (talk) 12:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TylerBurden (talk) 11:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stanislav Krapivnik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from podcasts.groong.org/guest/skrapivnik. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia’s copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. MCE89 (talk) 06:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I am puzzled, what the infringed source is. Could you please provide a reference, where and what infringing text came from? ApoieRacional (talk) 20:25, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ApoieRacional! Your additions to Draft:Stanislav Krapivnik have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the pie! 🙂 EkoGraf (talk) 09:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. Additionally, the following restriction(s) apply to this topic area: Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, though editors who are not extended-confirmed may post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area on article talk pages. Should disruption occur on article talk pages, administrators may take enforcement actions against disruptive editors and/or apply page protection on article talk pages. However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even on article talk pages. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, Articles for deletion nominations, WikiProjects, requests for comment, requested moves, and noticeboard discussions. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Nuclear risk during the Russo-Ukrainian war (2022–present). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 05:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear risk during the Russo-Ukrainian war (2022–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Mearsheimer bibliography, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nicolai N. Petro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Russian language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:56, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page MRI contrast agent, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Hipal (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow Wikipedian, I noticed, that you reverted my edit on this page Aleksandr Dugin.
Wiki-policies require explanation for every reversal:

In the edit summary or on the article's talk page, provide a succinct explanation detailing why the change is being reverted or why the reversion is beneficial. In instances of blatant vandalism, clearly disruptive edits, or unexplained content removal, a brief explanation may suffice. However, in situations involving content disputes, offering a well-reasoned and politely worded justification is important to avoid unnecessary disagreements and to promote constructive collaboration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Reverting#:~:text=In%20the%20edit%20summary%20or,and%20to%20promote%20constructive%20collaboration. 

For example, I provided explanation for my edit (which happened to be an addition):

I think it is very important to mention in the first paragraph, and that Dugin actively uses Orthodox Christian Theology in his works. The Russian version of this article has a whole section about Dugin's religious views. I can translate it, if other readers are interested. 

Could you explain why you reversed my edit citing a specific Wiki-policy? Thank you in advance, Apoie. ApoieRacional (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ilse Hagedorn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Circassian genocide

added links pointing to Muhajirism and Georgia

Russian language

added a link pointing to Czech

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Macan (singer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just so you know, the TAC transcript of Europe’s Bleak Future is already cited in the Lectures section. Sorry for making it so obscure! Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 00:55, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for correcting, letting me know, and your fun-to-read contributions to Wikipedia 🙂 ApoieRacional (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I’m Belbury. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Grokipedia have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article’s talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. I couldn’t see how Readers pointed out that the most significant drawback of grokipedia.com is the lack of images. was supported by the cited source, the writer only says I haven’t seen any photos on the site yet. If you were intending to summarise the reader comments below the article, those aren’t considered an appropriate source per WP:USERGEN. Belbury (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comment. I am still relatively new to Wikipedia, and I am learning.

The lack of images in Grokipedia is striking, if you take the time to check it out yourself. However, ” I haven’t seen any photos on the site yet ” is the best “independent source” that I was able to find on Google. There is not much infor about Grokipedia in Scopus or Lens.org , the 2 most reliable source, that I normally use to find references. What is the Standard Operating Procedure on Wiki, when the infor is correct and easily verifiable by anyone, but there are no peer-reviewed studies of this phenomenon? ApoieRacional (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything at Wikipedia needs to be WP:VERIFIABLE according to a reliable published source. If an apparently true statement like “Grokipedia has no images” seems obvious but hasn’t been mentioned by any secondary sources, that may be a sign that it’s just not important enough to mention in the Wikipedia article, at least yet. Belbury (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply. I just searched Scopus for TITLE-ABS-KEY(grokipedia). You know, what I found: “No documents matching your keywords were found”.

Following your logic, the article about Grokipedia should not even be on Wikipedia.

Do you agree with me, that the lack of images a significant drawback of Grokipedia?

Would you tell your friend/relative, who is in a elementary school, not to search Grokipedia for copy-left images to be used in her school paper? If yes, please help me to get this important statement about Groki-disadvantage to be prominently displayed on that page.

I subscribe to the purposive approach: “if the rule is not clear in a particular case, you should interpret the rule using the rule’s purpose rather than the rule’s literal language”.

The reference I provided about the lack of images in Grokipedia serves the wiki-purposes well. Do you agree? ApoieRacional (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m afraid I don’t know what Scopus is, but Wikipedia’s article about Grokipedia already cites many reliable sources.

I certainly agree with you that Grokipedia doesn’t appear to have any images, and that it might be worth mentioning this in Wikipedia’s article about it, but I don’t think that we can do that yet without a source. Maybe a suitable source does exist, though. You could raise this on the article talk page at Talk:Grokipedia. Belbury (talk) 20:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion about the Talk:Grokipedia. Sorry, I forgot to wiki-link Scopus. ApoieRacional (talk) 20:23, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ApoieRacional! Your additions to International Criminal Court investigation in Ukraine have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boud (talk) 09:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Richard Sakwa seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also: § Richard Sakwa. —Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have concerns about this edit as well, much of which is not supported in the sources and seems to me to be written by AI.[1] Can you confirm if you used AI to write this? LordCollaboration (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the edit was machine-generated. They were evasive about this on my talk page. —Gurkubondinn (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ukrainian conscription crisis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m CurryTime7-24. An edit that you recently made to Dmitri Shostakovich seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arthur Birch (organic chemist), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What’s in your new, second “sandbox” promises to be interesting. Note, however, two points.

1. If this is (or if it has started off as) a translation into English of an article from some other (Russian-language?) Wikipedia, then you must say so, clearly, as quickly as possible. Please see Help:Translation#Attribution and follow what it says.
2. You should give the original title (whether in Russian, Ukrainian, French or whatever) of a source rather than just an English translation of this. An English translation is welcome as a supplement to this. I’ve demonstrated this for you. (Strictly speaking, title= should specify the Russian title in Roman script; script-title=ru: should specify it in Cyrillic script; trans-title= should specify your English translation of the title. For languages such as French that use Roman letters, this doesn’t apply.)

Happy editing! — Hoary (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your email. Are you talking about a draft of a new section about Richard Sakwa:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AApoieRacional%2Fsandbox&section=1&veaction=editsource ?

It is not a translation of anything, but I did use AI to make the first draft of it. ApoieRacional (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not emailed you, and this is not about the article Richard Sakwa (which I’ve never even glanced at). If you’d clicked on the linked “demonstrated this” in the message to which you are replying, you’d know that I was writing about what is in User:ApoieRacional/sandbox2. (There’s also a hint at the start, with “your new, second ‘sandbox'”.) This has a number of references that are described with English titles alone but that in reality are not titled in English. (Example: “Russian paratrooper who participated in the invasion of Ukraine: ” I don’t see justice in this war””. SP – News Balti Moldova (in Russian).) Please do not use “AI”. — Hoary (talk) 23:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I will be very busy with an unrelated project for some time. Would you do the honors of finishing the draft about Filatyev’s book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ApoieRacional/sandbox2 ?

You are a more experienced user. I have never successfully created a new article, and I do not know what it takes.

BTW, I read the book. It really is “141 pages of horror”. ApoieRacional (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andriy Melnyk.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Darya Dugina, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:47, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Darya Dugina

added a link pointing to Cantate

International sanctions during the Russo-Ukrainian war

added a link pointing to Carlsberg

Spatial disorientation

added a link pointing to Auditory

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Isotopes of lutetium, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:12, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]