Please note that drafts such as [[Draft:Bill Stackhouse]] are ”’not”’ allowed to be filed in categories next to finished articles in mainspace, per both [[WP:DRAFTNOCAT]] and [[WP:USERNOCAT]]. It doesn’t matter if it’s in draftspace or userspace — the page ”’must”’ stay ”’out”’ of any categories while it’s in draft or sandbox mode, and may be added to categories ”’only”’ if and when it gets accepted and moved into mainspace by an [[WP:AFC]] reviewer. As the page has already had to be removed from categories ”seven” times ”today” by myself or other editors, ”’do not”’ readd it to categories again — and please note that there can be consequences for [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]], such as the immediate deletion of the page and/or the partial or total removal of your editing privileges, if you do not stop trying to readd it to categories. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 00:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Please note that drafts such as [[Draft:Bill Stackhouse]] are ”’not”’ allowed to be filed in categories next to finished articles in mainspace, per both [[WP:DRAFTNOCAT]] and [[WP:USERNOCAT]]. It doesn’t matter if it’s in draftspace or userspace — the page ”’must”’ stay ”’out”’ of any categories while it’s in draft or sandbox mode, and may be added to categories ”’only”’ if and when it gets accepted and moved into mainspace by an [[WP:AFC]] reviewer. As the page has already had to be removed from categories ”seven” times ”today” by myself or other editors, ”’do not”’ readd it to categories again — and please note that there can be consequences for [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]], such as the immediate deletion of the page and/or the partial or total removal of your editing privileges, if you do not stop trying to readd it to categories. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 00:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Bill Stackhouse|Bill Stackhouse]] (December 10) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by TheInevitables was:
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–
—
–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Bill Stackhouse]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Bill_Stackhouse ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheInevitables&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bill_Stackhouse ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
[[User:TheInevitables|TheInevitables]] ([[User talk:TheInevitables|talk]]) 03:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
Hello, BillStackhouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don’t hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I’ve moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:A blueprint for business architectures, from its old location at User:BillStackhouse/sandbox/A Blueprint for Business Architectures. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Draft:Bill Stackhouse. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. AlphaCore talk 21:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
|
Hello, BillStackhouse!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk / contribs) 19:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC) |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to find multiple reliable, secondary sources that cover the subject in-depth and are independent. Even if we look at WP:JOURNALCRIT (although I am unsure it applies here), its criteria states it should be influential, frequently cited by other sources or be historically important. Unless you can prove this paper is both notable and influential in the subject area, I would say the chances of this being accepted are slim.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaCore were: The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not resubmit without a rework. The draft is AI-generated and not in a Wikipedia standard structure or content format.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaCore was: The comment the reviewer left was:
Need more reliable sources to verify Notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Please note that drafts such as Draft:Bill Stackhouse are not allowed to be filed in categories next to finished articles in mainspace, per both WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT. It doesn’t matter if it’s in draftspace or userspace — the page must stay out of any categories while it’s in draft or sandbox mode, and may be added to categories only if and when it gets accepted and moved into mainspace by an WP:AFC reviewer. As the page has already had to be removed from categories seven times today by myself or other editors, do not readd it to categories again — and please note that there can be consequences for disruption, such as the immediate deletion of the page and/or the partial or total removal of your editing privileges, if you do not stop trying to readd it to categories. Bearcat (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
