User talk:Cdjp1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 36: Line 36:

I know that some books have DOI but I’ve always avoided putting them in because most don’t, it makes the citations inconsistent and adds extra length and wikitext.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hornkranz_massacre&curid=81788045&diff=1326709878&oldid=1326626229] Is there a reason you think it’s helpful to have this information? ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) ”'[[User:buidhe|<span style=”color:red”>b</span><span style=”color:#EF6305″>u</span><span style=”color:#FEE907″>I</span><span style=”color:green”>d</span><span style=”color: #0141F3″>h</span><span style=”color:#800080″>e</span>]]”’ 13:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

I know that some books have DOI but I’ve always avoided putting them in because most don’t, it makes the citations inconsistent and adds extra length and wikitext.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hornkranz_massacre&curid=81788045&diff=1326709878&oldid=1326626229] Is there a reason you think it’s helpful to have this information? ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) ”'[[User:buidhe|<span style=”color:red”>b</span><span style=”color:#EF6305″>u</span><span style=”color:#FEE907″>I</span><span style=”color:green”>d</span><span style=”color: #0141F3″>h</span><span style=”color:#800080″>e</span>]]”’ 13:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

:No particular reason bar completionism, feel free to remove it, as this case (similar to most cases) the doi isn’t really “different” to the isbn. — [[User:Cdjp1|Cdjp1]] ([[User talk:Cdjp1#top|talk]]) 13:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 13:24, 10 December 2025

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cornish language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cornish language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies/OR/United Kingdom (1913-1953) has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I know that some books have DOI but I’ve always avoided putting them in because most don’t, it makes the citations inconsistent and adds extra length and wikitext.[1] Is there a reason you think it’s helpful to have this information? (t · c) buIdhe 13:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No particular reason bar completionism, feel free to remove it, as this case (similar to most cases) the doi isn’t really “different” to the isbn. — Cdjp1 (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version