:We genuinely value Wikipedia and were trying to learn how to contribute properly. We would really appreciate another chance to continue learning and editing in a responsible way.
:We genuinely value Wikipedia and were trying to learn how to contribute properly. We would really appreciate another chance to continue learning and editing in a responsible way.
:Thank you for your time and consideration.}} [[User:Charlotte Evans3110|Charlotte Evans3110]] ([[User talk:Charlotte Evans3110#top|talk]]) 07:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for your time and consideration.}} [[User:Charlotte Evans3110|Charlotte Evans3110]] ([[User talk:Charlotte Evans3110#top|talk]]) 07:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|ToBeFree}} any comment on the ‘shared network’ explanation, does it sufficiently account for the CU findings? –[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 08:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
== Request for unblock ==
== Request for unblock ==
Hello, Charlotte Evans3110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thapy- comechatツ 06:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Per MOS:REFPUNCT, please stop adding spaces before ref tags. Please go through all your previous edits and revert all the edits where you have done this. GA-RT-22 (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GA-RT-22 (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GA-RT-22 (talk) 18:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Charlotte Evans3110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing to respectfully request an unblock of my account, which was recently blocked for disruptive editing, specifically adding unnecessary spacing before links.
- I want to sincerely apologize for these edits. I am new to Wikipedia and was still learning how to contribute correctly. I now understand that my formatting changes were not appropriate and did not follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style. The mistakes were unintentional, and I take full responsibility for them.
- In addition, my friends’ accounts were blocked because we were using the same network, I assure you that we are 6 different people using different systems to make our edits. They are also new to Wikipedia and did not participate in the edits that led to this block. I kindly request that their accounts be reviewed separately, as they were not involved in any disruptive actions. Their accounts are as below:
- – Editwithsam – Anthony.Thomaxs – Johncampbell2392 – Williambrown75 – Rojer James2209 – JessicaJack-15
- We genuinely value Wikipedia and were trying to learn how to contribute properly. We would really appreciate another chance to continue learning and editing in a responsible way.
- Thank you for your time and consideration.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Charlotte Evans3110 (talk) 07:39, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: any comment on the ‘shared network’ explanation, does it sufficiently account for the CU findings? —DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Charlotte Evans3110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing to respectfully request an unblock of my account, which was recently blocked for disruptive editing, specifically adding unnecessary spacing before links.
I want to sincerely apologize for these edits. I am new to Wikipedia and was still learning how to contribute correctly. I now understand that my formatting changes were not appropriate and did not follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style. The mistakes were unintentional, and I take full responsibility for them.
In addition, my friends’ accounts were blocked because we were using the same network, I assure you that we are 6 different people using different systems to make our edits. They are also new to Wikipedia and did not participate in the edits that led to this block. I kindly request that their accounts be reviewed separately, as they were not involved in any disruptive actions. Their accounts are as below:
– Editwithsam
– Anthony.Thomaxs
– Johncampbell2392
– Williambrown75
– Rojer James2209
– JessicaJack-15
We genuinely value Wikipedia and were trying to learn how to contribute properly. We would really appreciate another chance to continue learning and editing in a responsible way.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Charlotte Evans3110 (talk) 07:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
