User talk:CuratorArchive: Difference between revisions

:::Of course — thank you for letting me know.

:::Of course — thank you for letting me know.

:::I will write my comments myself and avoid AI-generated responding. [[User:CuratorArchive|CuratorArchive]] ([[User talk:CuratorArchive#top|talk]]) 10:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

:::I will write my comments myself and avoid AI-generated responding. [[User:CuratorArchive|CuratorArchive]] ([[User talk:CuratorArchive#top|talk]]) 10:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis|Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis]] (December 13) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Netherzone was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–

—

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Not ready for article space. Some claims are unsourced and seem that they might be synthesis or [[WP:OR]]. The references are formatted incorrectly with a list of numbers followed by a list of the citations. The photographs are formatted in an odd way, that does not follow MOS; they are centered and should be either on the left or right side (but avoiding “sandwiching”) or placed in a formatted gallery near the lower part of the article. Many of the the references do not contain URLs, so the content is currently unverifiable. Please add links to the citations if possible so they can be read by reviewers}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Giorgos_Pol._Ioannidis ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Netherzone&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Giorgos_Pol._Ioannidis ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 19:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CuratorArchive! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is written and structured like a promotional website for the artist. It contains unnecessary details and the sheer number of images used is excessive. Much of this content belongs on his personal website. See WP:NOTWEBHOST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Netherzone (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CuratorArchive. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CuratorArchive. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CuratorArchive|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Netherzone (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, and my apologies for the delayed reply — I have only just seen it.

I confirm that I am not being paid, directly or indirectly, to write or edit this draft. I have no financial interest or any form of compensation related to Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis or this article.

My edits come from my personal interest in art and in documenting Greek artists whose work I believe merits inclusion based on published sources. I fully respect Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest, and I am editing solely as a volunteer, relying only on verifiable references.

If you believe that any part of the draft — including the number of images or specific sections — should be reduced or adjusted to better comply with Wikipedia standards, I would appreciate your guidance and I will make the necessary changes immediately.

Please let me know if you need any further clarification. CuratorArchive (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how it is that you apparently have the copyrights to photographs of his works if there is no connection. How did you acquire these rights? Thank you, I await your response. Netherzone (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your question. I am happy to clarify.

The photographs of the artworks were not uploaded by me in the beginning.

They were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons directly by the artist, who also contacted the Commons permissions team and provided his authorization for their use under the appropriate license.

The images were already properly licensed and publicly available on Commons, so I simply used them in the draft to illustrate works that are discussed in published sources.

This process did not involve any compensation, editorial direction, or request from the artist. I am not acting on his behalf. I am only using media that has already been approved and released through the standard Commons procedure.

If you need something more, about this situation, please let me know.

— CuratorArchive CuratorArchive (talk) 10:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I think I understand now. The image licenses says CuratorArchive uploaded these to Commons, so you are Giorgos Pol. Ionannidis himself, and the article Draft:Giorgos Pol. Ioannidis is an autobiography. Netherzone (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LuniZunie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

– LuniZunie_(talk) 21:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and for pointing out these concerns.

I fully understand Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding the use of large language models and I will not use AI-generated text for this draft.

My intention is to rewrite all sections manually, using only published, verifiable sources and ensuring a strictly neutral, encyclopedic tone.

I will also revise the structure to avoid essay-like writing, remove any speculative or vague statements, and ensure that all references correspond directly to reliable published material.

If you have any specific areas you believe should be prioritised or significantly adjusted first, I would greatly appreciate your guidance before I proceed with the revisions.

Thank you again for your time and assistance.

— CuratorArchive CuratorArchive (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CuratorArchive Please do not use AI to respond on talk pages. – LuniZunie_(talk) 22:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course — thank you for letting me know.

I will write my comments myself and avoid AI-generated responding. CuratorArchive (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Not ready for article space. Some claims are unsourced and seem that they might be synthesis or WP:OR. The references are formatted incorrectly with a list of numbers followed by a list of the citations. The photographs are formatted in an odd way, that does not follow MOS; they are centered and should be either on the left or right side (but avoiding “sandwiching”) or placed in a formatted gallery near the lower part of the article. Many of the the references do not contain URLs, so the content is currently unverifiable. Please add links to the citations if possible so they can be read by reviewers

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Netherzone (talk) 19:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]