User talk:Daniel Carriere: Difference between revisions

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Royal Tusk. Thank you. tony 19:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I AM Daniel Carriere in ROYAL TUSK – The subject of this info. I WAS vaccine Injured. Please rectify my edit, or offer what steps I need to take to correct this incorrect record.

Thank you, Daniel Carriere (talk) 19:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please see the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects. I suggest that you propose changes on the article’s talk page (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions. —tony 19:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have checked out the conflict of interest page. This is not a case as such.

I was in hospital with a pulmonary embolism caused by the Pfizer Covid MRNA vaccine. What reliable source do you want? Blood panels – Hospital records? As it stands now it is factually inaccurate. Please do reply with options.

Also, Vaccine Injury is a common thing. This is why all governments have programs to support vaccine injured individuals. Not controversial in any form. Daniel Carriere (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’m removing the section entirely — for some reason I was under the belief it was supported by a reference but in looking more closely the nearest references don’t have anything to do with it. Sorry for the trouble! tony 19:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tony thanks for the start. This section is important – I would just like it to be accurate. We are long past emergency times where positing true vaccine injury cases would get censored. What do I need to include this in MY story? It’s important the truth is known.

Thanks Daniel Carriere (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you like – I could link to a class action I am currently part of against the Canadian Government? Would that work? Daniel Carriere (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A link to the class action itself (a “primary” source) would not be sufficient to support it. Generally sources need to be published, secondary, and reliable (that last one has a specific definition here), but in this case the article isn’t about COVID or vaccines or Daniel Carriere; it’s about the band, and that information probably wouldn’t meaningfully help a reader understand more about the band. tony 20:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is extremely important to the history of the band – Our fanbase raised nearly $20,000 to support me with treatment.

Why are you pushing back on this so hard? None of this was required when someone added the “long covid” info – What is different? Daniel Carriere (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That information shouldn’t have been added without a source originally, either. tony 23:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s literally a fundamental part of the history of this group. Absolutely should be included. I will add and link my class action and when I was named in city hall while our elected officials discussed this.

I do expect this to pass review. Thank you Daniel Carriere (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]