User talk:Deex123: Difference between revisions

Line 143: Line 143:

:@[[User:Hotwiki|Hotwiki]] just quickly jumping in. Per [[WP:NONENG]], non-English sources are acceptable on the English Wikipedia. Why do you see it as an issue?

:Btw I was here to say thank you @[[User:Deex123|Deex123]] for your recent article creations 🙂 [[User:Broc|Broc]] ([[User talk:Broc|talk]]) 15:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

::Its an issue, because its hard to readproof something that is in different language, to the point I can’t find what is being referenced. A lot of South Korean pop culture content get coverage from third party references that are in English language, I cannot understand why Deex123 isn’t using references that are in English, especially this is English Wikipedia. We aren’t typing in Hangul when editing these pages. [[User:Hotwiki|Hotwiki]] ([[User talk:Hotwiki|talk]]) 18:52, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 22:27, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t ignore this message and start using the edit summary. Hotwiki (talk) 23:36, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG, lacks any critical reviews of the song.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Deex123!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Hotwiki. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My First Love Song (KickFlip song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 13:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Choi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guninvalid was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of songs recorded by Nmixx instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems to have duplicate scope with Nmixx discography. Consider simply etargetting the redirect and merging content from here into it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

guninvalid (talk) 10:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guninvalid was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of songs recorded by Nmixx instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Simply adding a See Also does not make it appropriate to move to article space. No other nontrivial changes since previous submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

guninvalid (talk) 08:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.
You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dem Jointz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boyz.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is English Wikipedia and all articles are written with English alphabet. Its completely hard to read references that are in Hangul. Please don’t post references that are purely in Hangul alphabet/language, especially references that don’t provide English translation. Hotwiki (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotwiki just quickly jumping in. Per WP:NONENG, non-English sources are acceptable on the English Wikipedia. Why do you see it as an issue?

Btw I was here to say thank you @Deex123 for your recent article creations 🙂 Broc (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Its an issue, because its hard to readproof something that is in different language, to the point I can’t find what is being referenced. A lot of South Korean pop culture content get coverage from third party references that are in English language, I cannot understand why Deex123 isn’t using references that are in English, especially this is English Wikipedia. We aren’t typing in Hangul when editing these pages. Hotwiki (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply