User talk:Grigoryevich: Difference between revisions

 

Line 53: Line 53:

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Grigoryevich|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing|your preferences]]. Thanks! <!– Template:Uw-editsummary2 –> [[User:S1mply.Dogmom|S1mply.dogmom]] ([[User talk:S1mply.Dogmom|talk]]) 23:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Grigoryevich|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing|your preferences]]. Thanks! <!– Template:Uw-editsummary2 –> [[User:S1mply.Dogmom|S1mply.dogmom]] ([[User talk:S1mply.Dogmom|talk]]) 23:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

:@[[User:S1mply.Dogmom|S1mply.Dogmom]] Thank you for reaching out. It may sound silly but I genuinely just forget to do it most of the time. [[User:Grigoryevich|Grigoryevich]] ([[User talk:Grigoryevich#top|talk]]) 23:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for January 8 ==

==Disambiguation link notification for January 8 ==

Hi Grigoryevich! I noticed your contributions to The Rockafeller Skank and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Qwerty123M (talk) 00:21, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grigoryevich. Thanks for your interest in the article The Fifth Element. That’s some interesting and cool trivia you added and I think it’s probably true. Just letting you know for future reference that as per WP:IMDB, IMDB (and in particular their ‘trivia’ section) is not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Accordingly, any source that states they got their information from IMDB is also not reliable. The Medium source you used [1] states this is where they got their information. Just thought I’d point this out to you in case it helps with future editing. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Damien Linnane Thank you for your notice. Grigoryevich (talk) 00:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Milla Jovovich did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You added too many links to the Carol article, from – to.

I see that you created your account on 18 December 2025, so you may not be familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Wikipedia may be open to all who want to contribute to it, but editing Wikipedia is not a willy-nilly process.

In the case of links, there is MOS:LINK. You added links within quotations. The “Best Actress” and “Supporting Actress” Oscar was already linked in the article, they do not need to be linked multiple times — it’s overkill. The section MOS:OVERLINK explains what should not be linked and why. The general public is Wikipedia’s readership, and readers do not need to be hammered with a deluge of links. Pyxis Solitary (yak). ⚢ 12:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Pyxis Solitary Noted. Thank you for reaching out. Grigoryevich (talk) 12:57, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Katya Zamolodchikova, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@S1mply.Dogmom Thank you for reaching out. It may sound silly but I genuinely just forget to do it most of the time. Grigoryevich (talk) 23:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honorific nicknames in popular music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]