User talk:Guylaen: Difference between revisions

Line 94: Line 94:

:{{Re|Klbrain}} Thank you for the message but I should defy that it’s a stub, not a short article. There are at least a thousand more words worth of history surrounding this event that I don’t have the time to write up at the moment.

:To me, a good article is at least the length of the Lord of the Rings… I joke, but still. I hate short articles. [[User:Guylaen|Guylaen]] ([[User talk:Guylaen#top|talk]]) 06:49, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

::I’m very happy to accept that criticism; I was being generous, as I tend to be in new page patrol reviews. Happy expanding! [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 15:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Norman Crockatt. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colin Figures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Edward’s School.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified Guylaen (talk) 08:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regading {{Infobox military exercise}}, it sounds like you want to overhaul the template to add new information and make it more useful… Can I help in anyway? I’m pretty good with infoboxes, one of my few talents… Anyway, if you want to team up I’m happy to help! – Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:27, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering if we should make a more general exercise infobox though.

For example, Clade X was an exercise about pandemics.

There are other exercises that other government departments and even businesses do. Guylaen (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How would you like to do this? Do you want to provide me with a list of values/parameters and I’ll build the code? What would work best for you? Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08, sorry for the extreme lack of communication about this on my part. We just did Cyber 9/12 here at MIIS – I wasn’t on a team, but I had to be available if they needed me to fold down tables. Last week I had a French conversational midterm, and then I had to go up to LLNL to visit the NIF, so a bunch of my time was spent on that. Today, I had to meet with Vladimir Norov and catch up on Central Asian issues. (I was surprised at his positive attitude about Trump and now my brain hurts). Next week I have to run the CCPCJ for Northwest Model United Nations (NWMUN).

Basically, all that to say that life is busy, but I suppose I did that to myself. I’m the one who wanted to stop working in kitchens, after all.

Anyways. YES. That would work. Guylaen (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA! No worries. Real life does get in the way sometime. The nice thing is there is no deadline here… Whenever you get the time, start mocking something up and I’m happy to work with you when it works in your schedule. No rush! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. You might like to pop a project tag or two on the talk page? Also, just an idea, I’d perhaps reduce the number of red links on the page? Thanks for the informative and extensive article! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Military Intelligence (Research)! 🙂 Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have added the appropriate portals to the talk pages for those pages. (Something I often forget to do. I will double-check all my creations to make sure they have portals)

Anyways, the red links will be there for about a month, so that I can see if I can make pages or redirect them somewhere. That’s my basic process to just work off of the red links on pages that I make. Guylaen (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or in my head it seems like a month but I make an article or two a day, so it will probably be a week. Guylaen (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Тeletriumph has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 28 § Тeletriumph until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 07:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Halloween Massacre of 1977. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this short article for an event demonstrating sustained coverage. It is clearly written, and appropriately supported from reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 01:41, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Thank you for the message but I should defy that it’s a stub, not a short article. There are at least a thousand more words worth of history surrounding this event that I don’t have the time to write up at the moment.

To me, a good article is at least the length of the Lord of the Rings… I joke, but still. I hate short articles. Guylaen (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m very happy to accept that criticism; I was being generous, as I tend to be in new page patrol reviews. Happy expanding! Klbrain (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment