User talk:HBehrouzi Metadata: Difference between revisions

Line 108: Line 108:

**Hamed**

[[User:Hamedbehrouzi|Hamedbehrouzi]] ([[User talk:Hamedbehrouzi|talk]]) 04:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Bovlb}}

:Hi again, just following up politely on my previous message regarding the restoration or reconsideration of the deleted item.

:I have since aligned all data on my verified sources (IMDb, Netflix, Scanline VFX, LinkedIn, and Wikipedia sandbox under [[User:HBehrouzi_Metadata]]).

:Could you please advise if I should reopen the request or proceed through Wikidata:Administrators’ noticeboard instead?

:Thank you very much for your time and help.

:[[User:Hamedbehrouzi|Hamedbehrouzi]] ([[User talk:Hamedbehrouzi|talk]]) 05:30, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

👋 Hello!
This account (**HBehrouzi Metadata**) is primarily used for maintaining structured and verifiable data related to professional profiles, film credits, and VFX/AI-related metadata across Wikimedia projects (Wikidata, Wikipedia, Commons).

🎯 Focus: Neutral data alignment, metadata cleanup, and interoperability between IMDb, LinkedIn, and Wikidata entities.

🧩 Note:
This account follows Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability guidelines — no promotional edits.
If any edit refers to a professional record associated with Hamed Behrouzi, it is made solely for **data consistency**, not for self-promotion.

You can leave a message here or contact via: `hamed [at] hamedbehrouzi [dot] com` HBehrouzi Metadata (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HBehrouzi Metadata – Please be aware that IMDb, LinkedIn, and Wikidata are considered by English Wikipedia to generally NOT be reliable sources as they are user-generated sources. — ERcheck (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, ERcheck.

Understood — this sandbox is strictly for metadata alignment and not for primary sourcing.

All entries remain non-promotional and used only for data structure testing across Wikimedia projects. 🙏 HBehrouzi Metadata (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Asilvering. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. asilvering (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HBehrouzi Metadata. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Asilvering, thanks for reaching out.

The edit you mentioned was indeed written with the help of a writing assistant, but all of the information was based on verifiable and reliable sources such as my official website, IMDb profile, and LinkedIn.

The text was carefully checked and summarized manually ، not automatically generated without sources.

I completely understand Wikipedia’s policy about AI-generated text and I’ll make sure any future edits include inline citations and clearer references.

I appreciate your reminder and your time.

Best,

Hamed

HBehrouzi Metadata (talk) 13:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Asilvering,

Thank you very much for your detailed note and for clarifying the COI and disclosure policies.

I completely understand your concern and appreciate the reminder.

To clarify, my edits were not intended for promotion or advertising my goal was simply to make sure accurate, well-sourced information is available, since there have been past inaccuracies or missing details.

I fully respect Wikipedia’s conflict-of-interest guidelines and will not directly edit the article about myself.

Instead, I’ll use the Talk page and provide reliable, third-party sources (such as IMDb, Netflix, and Scanline VFX references) so that independent editors can review and decide what’s appropriate.

I have no paid relationship or external compensation for these contributions, and I’ll make sure everything is properly disclosed if needed.

Thanks again for your time and for maintaining the quality standards of Wikipedia.

Best regards,

Hamed

HBehrouzi Metadata (talk) 13:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am the subject of this article and I am disclosing a conflict of interest (COI).
I will not directly edit the article and will only suggest changes with reliable sources. HBehrouzi Metadata (talk) 14:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you to the reviewing editors.
I am the subject of this article and I am disclosing a conflict of interest (COI).
I would like to suggest factual and contextual updates related to verified identity data and knowledge alignment.
The goal of this request is to ensure accuracy and verifiable sourcing for the information about my professional profile, not to promote or self-publish.

The previous content and metadata were based on externally verified sources that establish the entity’s notability and structured data consistency (IMDb, Scanline VFX, Netflix, Apple TV+, LinkedIn, and the official website).
All references are third-party and verifiable.

1. Update the contextual description to clarify professional scope:

  *Lead & Senior Animator | Technical Animator | AI Architect — working across film, games, and episodic productions (Netflix, Apple TV+, Disney+, Amazon Prime, etc.).*

2. Ensure identity data alignment for structured content (schema.org Person / Wikidata item / EverybodyWiki entry) reflecting consistent and verified identifiers.
3. Confirm verified production credits, including:

  - *Monarch: Legacy of Monsters* (Apple TV+)  
  - *Wednesday – Season 2* (Netflix)  
  - *The Witcher – Season 4* (Netflix)  
  - *The Old Guard 2* (Netflix)  
  - *Creation of the Gods II* (China / VFX)

4. Clarify nationality and base location: *Iranian-born animator based in Seoul, South Korea.*

- Reliable sources for verification:**

– IMDb profile
– LinkedIn (verified badge confirming employment at Scanline VFX and credits on Netflix and Apple TV+)
– Scanline VFX
– Eyeline Studios
– Official website
– Netflix listings
– Apple TV+ listings

(Verified résumé on file; corroborates with IMDb and LinkedIn data.)*

- Additional professional sources:**

– Vimeo portfolio (animation & film credits)
– YouTube channel (public reels & talks)
– Zerply professional profile

I have disclosed my conflict of interest above and fully understand Wikipedia’s COI and verifiability guidelines.
Please review these factual data points and apply updates where appropriate to ensure accuracy and structured alignment across identity-related records.

Thank you very much for your time and for maintaining the quality and integrity of the encyclopedia.

Best regards,

Hamedbehrouzi (talk) 04:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bovlb:

Hi again, just following up politely on my previous message regarding the restoration or reconsideration of the deleted item.

I have since aligned all data on my verified sources (IMDb, Netflix, Scanline VFX, LinkedIn, and Wikipedia sandbox under User:HBehrouzi_Metadata).

Could you please advise if I should reopen the request or proceed through Wikidata:Administrators’ noticeboard instead?

Thank you very much for your time and help.

Hamedbehrouzi (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]