User talk:ILoveRichardSimmons: Difference between revisions

Line 129: Line 129:

<div class=”user-block uw-pblock” style=”padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(–border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px”>[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style=”margin-left:45px”>You have been ”'[[WP:Partial blocks|blocked]]”’ ”'[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]”’ from editing certain [[Wikipedia:Namespace|namespaces]] ((Article)) for disruptive editing. Please reply to concerns described at [[Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents#User%3AILoveRichardSimmons persistent vandalism of recently deceased comedy actors’ pages]]. </div><div style=”margin-left:45px”>If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia’s [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!– Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the “tlx|” code. –><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  — [[User:rsjaffe|<b style=”font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkSlateGrey;”>rsjaffe</b>]] [[User talk:rsjaffe|🗣️]] 11:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!– Template:uw-pblockindef –>

:I apologize for any inconveniences. I found some sources for claims I want to make. Please unblock me. {{unblock|reason=I found sources I wish to add to Wikipedia. [[User:ILoveRichardSimmons|ILoveRichardSimmons]] ([[User talk:ILoveRichardSimmons#top|talk]]) 19:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)}} — [[User:ILoveRichardSimmons|ILoveRichardSimmons]] ([[User talk:ILoveRichardSimmons#top|talk]]) 19:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

:I apologize for any inconveniences. I found some sources for claims I want to make. Please unblock me.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I found sources I wish to add to Wikipedia. [[User:ILoveRichardSimmons|ILoveRichardSimmons]] ([[User talk:ILoveRichardSimmons#top|talk]]) 19:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |decline = Given your weeks of disruption, best that this partial block remain in effect. It most certainly doesn’t stop you providing your sources via [[WP:EDITREQ]], though if you are disruptive there, too, expect your block to be expanded site-wide. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 20:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)}}

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Simmons. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sugar Tax (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Augmented Seventh (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blake Clark, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. not in cited source, also see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rebecca Shoichet, you may be blocked from editing. see WP:DOB and WP:BLP Waxworker (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BLP and WP:DOB, per BLP policy “Contentious material about living (or, in some cases, recently deceased) persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion” – dates of birth are a sensitive piece of personal information and must be sourced. Where are you getting this birth date from? Waxworker (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I get it from? I thought it was just a known thing. Since every other birthday is on there. — ILoveRichardSimmons (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If other articles have unsourced birthdates, that is a bad example to follow and they should be removed. If you don’t cite a reliable source explicitly dating her birth date, it shouldn’t be on the article. The Wikiprojects for Anime and Film have lists of reliable/unreliable sources related to their subjects that may be helpful for finding a source, WP:A&M/RS and WP:FILMSOURCES respectively. Help:Referencing for beginners also has guidance regarding citing sources that may be helpful. Waxworker (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, huh? I will search for a source or two. You are welcome. — ILoveRichardSimmons (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Britt McKillip. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I am sorry. — ILoveRichardSimmons (talk) 00:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –G M 02:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ILoveRichardSimmons. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 01:49, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ILoveRichardSimmons!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 01:49, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 01:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I try to create more pages on other wikis, but I am blocked with the IP address. While logged in, I never got blocked as of yet. Please fix this issue so I can be logged in to other wikis and be allowed to create more pages. — ILoveRichardSimmons (talk) 01:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why did you revert all the work we’ve been doing on Floyd Vivino today? It deserves an edit summary at least. Kire1975 (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to revert it to insert the recent death template. — ILoveRichardSimmons (talk) 10:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You did a lot more than re-insert the recent death template. You just blanked out a lot of content for no reason, and that’s after being warned above so many times about disruptive editing. There isn’t a whole lot of activity on the death anyway. Don’t put it back again. In fact, have another level 4 warning:

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary again, as you did at Article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kire1975 (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –G M 10:26, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –G M 01:10, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary again, as you did at Catherine O’Hara, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kire1975 (talk) 04:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kire1975 (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grahaml35 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Grahaml35 (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 10:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AE notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is User:ILoveRichardSimmons persistent vandalism of recently deceased comedy actors’ pages and others. Thank you. Kire1975 (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any inconveniences. I found some sources for claims I want to make. Please unblock me.

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveRichardSimmons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Given your weeks of disruption, best that this partial block remain in effect. It most certainly doesn’t stop you providing your sources via WP:EDITREQ, though if you are disruptive there, too, expect your block to be expanded site-wide. Yamla (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AE notice

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment