User talk:KapodistriasCH: Difference between revisions

 

 

Line 12: Line 12:

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks again, and happy editing!

[[User:Fermiboson|Fermiboson]] ([[User talk:Fermiboson|talk]]) 00:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

[[User:Fermiboson|Fermiboson]] ([[User talk:Fermiboson|talk]]) 00:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Michalis Damianos|Michalis Damianos]] (December 10) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. ”’Wikipedia guidelines [[WP:NEWLLM|prohibit the use of LLMs]] to write articles from scratch.”’ In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:<br />

* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]

* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects

* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]

* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]

* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=This is a very new article and yet one source is 404 and another gives a random photo. A third source (Offsite) seems to be scrape effort. The subject is notable, as a government minister but the sources need to be checked by humans.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Michalis Damianos]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Michalis_Damianos ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChrysGalley&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Michalis_Damianos ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 16:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”

|- style=”vertical-align: top;”

| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]]

| <div style=”background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;”>Hello, ”’KapodistriasCH”’!

Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the ”'[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]”’. If you have any ”other” questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the ”'[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]”’, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! [[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 16:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)</div>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a very new article and yet one source is 404 and another gives a random photo. A third source (Offsite) seems to be scrape effort. The subject is notable, as a government minister but the sources need to be checked by humans.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

ChrysGalley (talk) 16:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, KapodistriasCH!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 16:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top