:Unfortunately this seems to be a canned LLM response. Using LLMs, even for writing on Wikipedia, can result in lots of errors. For example there is a malformed decline template at the top of your article with the only text being “u”. [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ff9e59″>”’Z E ”'</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ff9e59″>”’T A”'</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|<span style=”color:#ff9e59;”>”3”</span>]]</sup> 15:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:Unfortunately this seems to be a canned LLM response. Using LLMs, even for writing on Wikipedia, can result in lots of errors. For example there is a malformed decline template at the top of your article with the only text being “u”. [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ff9e59″>”’Z E ”'</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ff9e59″>”’T A”'</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|<span style=”color:#ff9e59;”>”3”</span>]]</sup> 15:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:If “references in my draft were personally verified by [you]”, then I am seriously worried and have no choice but to ask: why did you seemingly falsify two citations? The URLs don’t match the content, and I can find no such evidence that sources by these names were ever published…. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|<span style=”color:#EB0533;”>GreenLipstickLesbian</span>]][[User Talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|💌]][[Special:Contribs/GreenLipstickLesbian|🦋]] 18:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:If “references in my draft were personally verified by [you]”, then I am seriously worried and have no choice but to ask: why did you seemingly falsify two citations? The URLs don’t match the content, and I can find no such evidence that sources by these names were ever published…. [[User:GreenLipstickLesbian|<span style=”color:#EB0533;”>GreenLipstickLesbian</span>]][[User Talk:GreenLipstickLesbian|💌]][[Special:Contribs/GreenLipstickLesbian|🦋]] 18:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Leonard Clifton|Leonard Clifton]] (December 18) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by MCE89 were:
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–
–>{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–
—
–> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=I’m not able to locate any source matching the details of reference 1 and its URL directs to an unrelated article, could you please fix this before resubmitting? Also note that IMDb is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] and should be replaced. Everything in this draft should be supported by a citation to a real, published source that fully [[WP:V|verifies]] the claims made.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Leonard Clifton]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Leonard_Clifton ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCE89&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leonard_Clifton ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
[[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 10:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WormEater13 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Hello, Leoscore!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC) |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to “write a Wikipedia article” can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. Editors must verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Completely LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.
As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can , and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 08:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi GreenLipstickLesbian, thank you for the welcome message and guidance. I completely understand the concern about LLM-generated content. To clarify, I am a real person and the acting credits in my draft—such as Amistad, Bring It On, Tupac’s “Temptations” video, and others—are all verifiable through publicly available sources including IMDb, published press coverage, and institutional records.
- My goal is simply to present accurate, well-sourced information about my career, and I’m happy to continue revising the draft so everything meets Wikipedia’s standards. I appreciate your help and the resources you shared. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0166758/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
- https://academycollection.org/web/arena/search#/entity/academy/72436213/leonard-clifton-in-amistad%2C-1997.?q=Leonard+Clifton&source=academy
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHA0tEYY8pk&t=41s
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmMZms8W8H4
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN40Lxw7Ylo&t=355s Leoscore (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the message and for welcoming me to Wikipedia. I understand the concern regarding LLM-generated content. While I did use assistance for formatting and citation structure, all of the text and references in my draft were personally verified by me using reliable published sources.
The article references verifiable materials including IMDb, published press coverage, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences catalog, and verified institutional sources (such as California State University, Northridge and the California African American Museum). I will continue ensuring that every statement is fully sourced and compliant with Wikipedia’s standards.
Thank you again for taking the time to review my submission and guide me through the process.
—Leoscore (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately this seems to be a canned LLM response. Using LLMs, even for writing on Wikipedia, can result in lots of errors. For example there is a malformed decline template at the top of your article with the only text being “u”. Z E T A3 15:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- If “references in my draft were personally verified by [you]”, then I am seriously worried and have no choice but to ask: why did you seemingly falsify two citations? The URLs don’t match the content, and I can find no such evidence that sources by these names were ever published…. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 18:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were: The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
