User talk:LunaEclipse: Difference between revisions

I will NOT accept paid editing in any way, shape, or form; requests for such activity on my talk page will be removed with no hesitation.

WP:RETENTION: This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics: the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them the Troubles Yasuke abortion living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed Falun Gong climate change the Balkans or Eastern Europe pseudoscience and fringe science She should not be given alerts for those areas.

Hi,
I wrote an article and its supposed do be in review. But I cant seem to find it anywhere. Can you help me find it? —ElliotCt (talk) 09:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ElliotCt It was probably deleted, may I know what is it about? Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 09:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A portuguese lawyer and politician ElliotCt (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ElliotCt Name/title? Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 09:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Portugal Lage ElliotCt (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

THey said it would be under review for at least for 8 weeks anda then its just deleted?? ElliotCt (talk) 09:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I know where you created the page? Like link to the page, eg. Earth Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 09:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look I created the page, and saw the message saying that it would be under revision. I didnt save it. So, what your sayin is that I’d have to do it all again. A weeks work al gone to waste? ElliotCt (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, but are you sure thats the name as there is nothing in the deletion log Plutus 💬 mess — Fortune favors the curious 09:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luna! Yesterday there was a Wikipedia page: International Alliance against State-Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking. I’m just wondering where is that as I just wanted to edit it? Thank you in advance for being there for helping 💐 —Wikitannia (talk) 18:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Draft:International Alliance against State-Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 22:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: Announcements: Tip of the Month: Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each biography, including at least one source for each paragraph. Progress (“moving the needle”): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year. 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women) 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women) Other ways to participate:

—Rosiestep (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:Davest3r08 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

1. BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
2. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
3. Arconning (submissions) with 860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
4. History6042 (submissions) with 804 tournament points
5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with 635 tournament points
6. TheDoctorWho (submissions) with 386 tournament points
7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 373 tournament points
8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 362 tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes
• vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 106 good articles, 5 good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3
• History6042 (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• TheDoctorWho (submissions) wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total
• Arconning (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

Next year’s competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Hello LunaEclipse, I’ve finished editing the article on Ayanda Mabulu and I think it’s sound and ready for any tweaks necessary. Apologies to Ira and C.Fred that had already started making edits, I think I overrode their changes by mistake when I saw editing conflicts that I thought were my own. Look forward to working with Wikipedia! —ChiefofBeans (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How can my name and his apear on Wikipedia —Ebomcommunity (talk) 04:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stella ! I am Thehistorian999 I hope you help me with some things —Thehistorian999 (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 01:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba şağ üstte olması gereken düzenle tuşu nerde?+Bilgi kutusu ve değisiklik òzeti nerde —Sahip Giray (talk) 01:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but I do not speak (what I assume to be) Turkish. I have used a welcome template to redirect you to the Turkish Wikipedia. They most likely have the answer to your question. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 01:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

| result = Tactical Ottoman victory; strategic Portuguese control maintained.^[1][2][3][4]
| casualties1 = Few^[4]
| casualties2 = 5 Ottoman galleys lost (Seydi Ali Reis); Portuguese losses reported as 8–10 ships in modern sources.^[2][1][3]

Contemporary and modern accounts differ on the result of the battle. Portuguese chronicles written in the 16th–19th centuries describe a Portuguese victory, but primary and modern Ottoman sources present another picture. According to Seydi Ali Reis’ own account, Mir’âtü’l-Memâlik, five Ottoman galleys were lost while Portuguese losses were heavy; the Portuguese fleet withdrew from the area. Modern historians such as Giancarlo Casale and Salih Özbaran conclude that the engagement was a tactical Ottoman victory, though strategic control of the Indian Ocean remained with Portugal.^[1][2][3][4]Harika, o zaman en gerekli olan kısmı — yani Wikipedia’daki yanlış sonucu ve kayıp bilgiler içeren “infobox” (bilgi kutusu) ile “Sonuç” paragrafını — düzeltecek tek parça wikitexti aşağıda senin için hazırladım.
👉 Sen bunu doğrudan Wikipedia’daki “Düzenle” kısmına yapıştırabilirsin (hiçbir kod bilmeye gerek yok). —Sahip Giray (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(I used a machine translator this time)

I’d rather not get involved with that, unfortunately. Military history is not necessarily my forte, and I don’t know what article you’re talking about. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 01:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nasıl uygularsın

1. İlgili Wikipedia sayfasına gir.

2. Sağ üstte “Düzenle” butonuna tıkla.

3. “Bilgi kutusu” kısmında | result = yazan satırı bul.

4. Yukarıdaki metni oraya yapıştır.

5. “Değişiklik özeti”ne şunu yaz:

> Corrected result and outcome per Seydi Ali Reis (1557) and modern academic sources (Casale 2010; Özbaran 1994). —Sahip Giray (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaynak açıklamaları

Seydi Ali Reis – Mir’âtü’l-Memâlik → Birincil kaynak; 1557’de yazılmış, Reis’in kendi anlatımı.

Casale (2010) → The Ottoman Age of Exploration, Oxford UP, modern akademik çalışma.

Özbaran (1994) → Osmanlı’nın Hint Okyanusu siyaseti üzerine Türkiye’deki en güvenilir kaynaklardan.

Monteiro (1995) → Portekiz deniz tarihçisi; taraflı olsa da karşı tarafın resmi kayıtlarını verir.

—
Nasıl uygularsın

1. İlgili Wikipedia sayfasına gir.

2. Sağ üstte “Düzenle” butonuna tıkla.

3. “Bilgi kutusu” kısmında | result = yazan satırı bul.

4. Yukarıdaki metni oraya yapıştır.

5. “Değişiklik özeti”ne şunu yaz:

> Corrected result and outcome per Seydi Ali Reis (1557) and modern academic sources (Casale 2010; Özbaran 1994). —Sahip Giray (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. First time here !!! Any tip or something that u want to give me?? I read Wikipedia nearly everyday but I never edit/write a article.
Sorry to bother you
Thank you as well —Wioeb (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am unsure if my idea for a split of articles in the lorenz sytem page [[1]] is worth it and how it would be done, i would love some help, thanks
JG —JG qwerty (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:Davest3r08 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Is the name John Biscuit good?
Im new here —John Biscuit (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good 😉 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 21:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi . . . How do I create a wiki? —JustAnInvisibleArtist (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to create an article, check out help:your first article. I would give advice on how to create a whole wiki, but that is outside Wikipedia’s scope. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 21:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:LunaEclipse and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hi, is there a way to change Zhang Ziyi’s profile picture? I work for Zhang Ziyi’s American representation at the Gersh Agency, and we don’t believe it accurately reflects her appearance. I have a file that Zhang Ziyi’s agent set, could I upload it to her page? —Salcido543 (talk) 02:42, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, you not allowed to edit the article as you have a conflict of interest. I recommend making an edit request. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 12:08, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for support in November! – On St. Cecilia’s Day – patron saint of music – I remember a composition by Benjamin Britten, and have a woman on the main page who illustrated songs, with a sense of humour. My places take you to Milan, my first visit to La Scala, and music features our latest choral Abendlob, with English music. — Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Wikipedia is neat. First time. What if I don’t have the birthday of the person I added? —Constitutionfriend (talk) 09:45, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just arrived at Slender Man stabbing due to new developments in the case and saw likely policy violations regarding one person’s pronouns stemming from this (and some subsequent) edits:

Edit with summary ‘Incorrect gender for geyser. She is female, regardless of “pronouns”. She attempted to murder somebody and doesnt deserve any sort of respect. Let’s make wiki correct, not “pronoun friendly”‘

There were multiple pronoun edits by different temp accounts, all seemingly new, including removable of sourced information unrelated to GENSEX. Not sure how to tell if they are the same person.

I followed the recent ARBCOM case regarding this issue, but am otherwise not very familiar with Wikipedia processes and can’t figure out how exactly to proceed.

If you could make sure someone who can handle this appropriately is notified, I’d be grateful. It seems interpreting the policies correctly is too much for me right now.

Thank you! 💜 CrystallineCat (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m looking to replace the photo on a page that only allows established wikipedia users to edit. Is there anywhere I can submit a replacement photo? I believe someone’s profile photo has been doctored. —Salcido543 (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

how can i write an artical about titanic —BooeyBaby12 (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]