User talk:Meow: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Welcome!

Hello, Meow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —Nlu (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nlu@Meow Camkgi (talk) 07:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✿⊱╮

There is currently a discussion at Draft:Tropical Storm Matmo: Fork which you may find relevant to 2025 Pacific typhoon season: Inconsistent date formats. Cheers. 124.217.189.70 (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect IFat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 2 § IFat until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 17:57, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please be informed the official PEAK INTENSITY for Kalmaegi is 115kts recorded by the JTWC. Whereas, the main annual typhoon season page and Kalmaegi’s page records the peak intensity of the storm, thus unneeded to revert back to Category 3. Grahamix1765 (talk) 10:33, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The official peak is 110 knots. It seems that you don’t know where to get the latest data.  🐱💬 12:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did JTWC have this earlier? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wp3125_3.gif Grahamix1765 (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They REVISED. And you reverted without even looking at comments I left there.  🐱💬 13:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I’ve been working on seasonal summary maps (e.g., 2025 Pacific typhoon season summary.png) using ATCF format tracking data. I’m running into an issue where pasting all the code into a single file causes the output image to connect all storm paths from end to start. This issue didn’t appear when I use hurdat2 format data. To avoid this, I’ve had to use --next and process each file individually, which is quite time-consuming. Could you suggest a way to handle multiple tracks in one file without them linking together? Leonardo Cirrus (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about that as I always use --next.  🐱💬 16:23, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Meow, thanks for creating GPT Image! Since your account has the autopatrolled flag, and new pages patrol doesn’t review your creations for these kinds of things, please remember to create talk pages for the articles you write and add tags for the appropriate WikiProjects. I find the Rater tool helpful for this job. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:34, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice. I was planning to add but it was too late in my timezone.  🐱💬 06:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]