User talk:Mickomicks: Difference between revisions

Line 18: Line 18:

Please visit and comment at [[Talk:Typhoon_Yagi#Super Typhoon or Severe Tropical Storm]]. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 09:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Mickomicks, I’m not sure why you undid my edit on [[Typhoon Yagi]]. ♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 17:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

== Invite ==

Hi Mickomicks! I noticed that you’ve made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Typhoon Yagi. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you’re aware of Wikipedia’s edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you’re doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Typhoon Yagi, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors’ changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. FourNoddlers (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Typhoon Yagi. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. FourNoddlers (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading the report of Yagi Mickomicks (talk) 09:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit and comment at Talk:Typhoon_Yagi#Super Typhoon or Severe Tropical Storm. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mickomicks, I’m not sure why you undid my edit on Typhoon Yagi. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones#Philippine intensity in lead section. FourNoddlers (talk) 04:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change the PAGASA intensity to what the attributed sources don’t say. You claim that PAGASA called Typhoon Meranti a super typhoon, but the source says it was simply a typhoon. You’ve been making similar edits on other articles, so I suggest you refrain from making those edits to avoid any issues. FourNoddlers (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply