User talk:Mprikhodko: Difference between revisions

 

Line 23: Line 23:

:No conflict of interest. Thank you [[User:Mprikhodko|Mprikhodko]] ([[User talk:Mprikhodko#top|talk]]) 02:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

:No conflict of interest. Thank you [[User:Mprikhodko|Mprikhodko]] ([[User talk:Mprikhodko#top|talk]]) 02:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Mprikhodko|Mprikhodko]], you mentioned you know the subject — that affiliation represents a conflict of interest. Also the photo you just uploaded was posted by the subject on Instagram two hours ago with a note saying it’s specifically for Wikipedia, which tells me you’re apparently in communication with the subject. –[[User:TonySt|<span style=”opacity:.95;border:1px outset #6ED;border-radius:30% 0;background:linear-gradient(30deg,#06C,#6ED);color:#fff;padding:2px 5px”><b>tony</b></span>]] 02:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

== November 2025 ==

== November 2025 ==

Hello, Mprikhodko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Luke Brugnara, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don’t hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! tony 02:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No conflict of interest. Thank you Mprikhodko (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mprikhodko, you mentioned you know the subject — that affiliation represents a conflict of interest. Also the photo you just uploaded was posted by the subject on Instagram two hours ago with a note saying it’s specifically for Wikipedia, which tells me you’re apparently in communication with the subject. —tony 02:25, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I’m SuperCode111. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Agentic AI have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a “soapbox” are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. SuperCode111 (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Luke Brugnara, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I just put the recent picture from 2025, November. It is policy. Thanks Mprikhodko (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Adakiko,
Thanks for your note. I updated the image to a more recent one from November 2025. The file is properly licensed and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. My intent was to improve the page with current information.
I’m happy to discuss this further on the article’s talk page. Let me know if you have any concerns about the image usage or licensing. Thanks! Mprikhodko (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You say the source of the picture is Instagram. Did you take the picture yourself? And why are you removing the material regarding his criminal activities and convictions? –jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.
Sorry it was mistake to remove part of criminal records. Yes this picture is in Instagram and I know this guy. Thanks. Mprikhodko (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just try to rewrite his profile in more appropriate way. Mprikhodko (talk) 05:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also please add this references to your page:
https://www.victorwienerassociates.com/featured-cases-medium/usa-vs-luke-d-brugnara Mprikhodko (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.courthousenews.com/convicted-fraudster-says-he-perishes-in-jail/ Mprikhodko (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2003/1222/178.html Mprikhodko (talk) 06:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you think it’s relevant that the picture came from Instagram? –jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is the most recent picture from 2025. Picture on your page from 2015(?)- I am not sure Mprikhodko (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I need to put here: Art was appraised for 80K. https://www.victorwienerassociates.com/featured-cases-medium/usa-vs-luke-d-brugnara Mprikhodko (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Mprikhodko (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also this regerences:https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artnews-art-america-merge-print-market-continues-decline-320844 Mprikhodko (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also, Please check this out: https://circuit9.blogspot.com/2017/05/case-o-week-crazy-like-bipolar.html Mprikhodko (talk) 19:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Federal prosecutors no longer dispute Luke Brugnara’s contention that some of the paintings he refused to pay for are likely forgeries. Mprikhodko (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.law.com/therecorder/2015/09/02/pro-se-defendant-argues-swindled-art-was-worthless/ Mprikhodko (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also let’s me rewrite your wiki post in sandbox and we can post it after agreement Mprikhodko (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
“Previously published on Instagram” does not give you or Wikipedia any rights to use it. Are you the photographer? –jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:32, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s now been released by the copyright holder, https://www.instagram.com/p/DP49apxD5Kk/, per my talk page. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And what is your relationship with Mr. Brugnara? –jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you’re asking me, I’m not Mprikhodko. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No relationship. Mprikhodko (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top