User talk:Multiplivision: Difference between revisions

Here’s wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Multiplivision! I see that you’ve already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Rtkat3 (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the cookies, Rtkat3!!! 😀 Multiplivision (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you please stop disruptive editing in No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie? It’s a Nickelodeon Original Film, not a Nickelodeon Movies film. If you don’t stop editing, then I will. Thank you. Akhil K. (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop. It’s shown in the opening AND closing of the film that it is a Nickelodeon Movies production. Multiplivision (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I must remind you that what YOU are doing is highly disruptive as you’re literally engaging in an edit war. Knock it off. Multiplivision (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So please, with all due respect, please stop. Multiplivision (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Fine. I will stop. Akhil K. (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Multiplivision. I’m going to remove Nickelodeon Movies in the category and in the infobox in No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie, and I’m also going to remove No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie in List of Nickelodeon Movies productions article too if you say yes. The reason why I’m going to remove the film is because the movie confirms that No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie is only a Nickelodeon Original Film. There’s no such credit as Nickelodeon Movies in trailer, and see IMDb for details. Thank you. Akhil K. (talk) 01:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Multiplivision (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paw Patrol. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hikingboii (talk) 01:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not know how page formats are supposed to work for internationally co-produced television series? If it’s produced between Canada and the United States, it’s not supposed to be American-Canadian. That is meant to be absent from the page as per the Manual of Style. Multiplivision (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Get. It. Right. Multiplivision (talk) 02:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link that explains that. Hikingboii (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just… stop reverting the edits. PLEASE. It’s going to get tiresome. Multiplivision (talk) 05:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I just said, please provide a link that explains what you’re talking about. Hikingboii (talk) 05:06, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Find it yourself. Multiplivision (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like that I couldn’t link for that. You will have to discuss on Talk:Paw Patrol. I will also have to discuss with another user that knows this (maybe an admin). Hikingboii (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplivision is correct, per MOS:TVCOUNTRY. Barry Wom (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the link. Now I get it. Hikingboii (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Teresa Gallagher, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Bourne Supremacy (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Please don’t add information that you know is unsourced (and should be sourced) with a CN tag. If you’d like to add information but are struggling with finding a source, you’re welcome to start a discussion at the article’s Talk page. DonIago (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Multiplivision! Skydance Media will introduce the Skydance brand on August 7, 2025, after the merger of Skydance Media, National Amusements and Paramount Global. OK! LogoFan2007 (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uh… okay? Multiplivision (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Multiplivision! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. IzzySwag (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you’re going to make these big changes to the lead sentences of the articles, you should first open up a discussion on the talk page. The common consensus has been that these films are animated despite their brief live-action scenes. Zingo156 (talk) 03:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages North Vancouver and John Kay. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Minecraft Movie, you may be blocked from editing. Barry Wom (talk) 10:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before wholesale changing images on a bunch of featured articles, it would be best if you brought it up on the talk page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 15:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“particularly in the process of the metamorphosis of Pitt’s character”. Shouldn’t that be sourced? Multiplivision (talk) 19:58, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but you added an entire new section to the article without providing a single citation. With 906 edits I’d think you must have suspected that might draw notice. DonIago (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My big question is that: how are the VFX companies that have worked on the film in need of sources? Aren’t they listed in the credits of the movie? Multiplivision (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are needed if/when you want to claim which VFX companies worked on what effects for the film. We don’t typically list VFX companies in an article simply for the sake of listing them, but rather strive to provide some context to the reader. DonIago (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bean movie (1997) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek Generations Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek II poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek VI poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek III poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek IV poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek V poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Talk Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Griffiths.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently changed the King Kong (2005 video game) article to use dmy dates instead of mdy dates. Could you explain this shift in style? It appears to go against MOS:DATERET and MOS:STYLEVAR, but I wanted to check with you first to see what you think. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 04:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the dates to the DMY format because the lead production country is New Zealand. NZ uses the DMY format, so it made sense for the article to use that format. Multiplivision (talk) 12:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Multiplivision! Your additions to Hop (film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change the format of dates, as you did to Rockstar Vancouver. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 21:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I have reverted your changes to multiple articles in which you are insisting on listing Nickelodeon as a production company. Per WP:BRD, please discuss these changes at the relevant talk page before reverting. Also, please provide an edit summary when making changes. Barry Wom (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are a production company though??? That’s the exact same thing as saying New Line Cinema is a distributor of all Warner Bros. films post-2008, even though NLC is a production subsidiary of the company.

You are not making any sense. Multiplivision (talk) 10:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are not a production company on any of the many films you have been changing. To take just one example, Rugrats Go Wild has in the credits “Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon present…”. The “present” caption indicates distribution only. They are NOT production companies. Now cut it out, or you will be reported. Barry Wom (talk) 11:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay so the same should be applied to New Line Cinema films then since they ALSO have a “presents” credit Multiplivision (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should. Barry Wom (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry for how I acted today. Multiplivision (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

report me then, at this point I don’t care anymore Multiplivision (talk) 11:14, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Imagine That (film). Barry Wom (talk) 11:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

did you even READ my other message? Multiplivision (talk) 11:09, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You need to discuss these changes. Barry Wom (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte’s Web (2006 film). The BBFC reference only confirms the distributor for the UK. You need to provide a source which confirms international distribution. Barry Wom (talk) 11:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply