User talk:Nagpurjournalism: Difference between revisions

Hello, Nagpurjournalism, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please Nagpur Journalism on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Thanks for your contributions to Nagpurjournalism. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and is not written in an encyclopedic manner.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit for review” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whre is problem Nagpurjournalism (talk) 10:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nagpurjournalism (talk) 09:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nagpurjournalism. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia’s Live Help channel on IRC to get real-time assistance.

Hello, Nagpurjournalism. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Journalism in Nagpur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journalism in Nagpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalism in Nagpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Capitals00 (talk) 05:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nagpurjournalism! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires substantive coverage not mentions is passing, as per WP:ANYBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devendra Darda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devendra Darda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 07:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dr Sunil Gupta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it lacks sufficient sources to prove notability and requires significant copy editing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back.

Please note that ‘Dr’ should not be in the Wikipedia article’s title.

Do not remove the speedy deletion tag on the redirect page. If you wish to contest the deletion, you may do so on the talk page. Aesurias (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Helped
We are trying improve my Article but we are unable this
please help to improve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagpurjournalism (talk • contribs) 06:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your question is very vague; what specific things do you need help with?

Also, who is “we”? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy’s edits 18:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Devendra Vijay Darda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Created hours after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devendra Darda (which resulted in “delete”) was started.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy’s edits 18:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Sunil Gupta. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don’ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link (“blue link“) in each entry
  • Only add a “red link” if used in existing articles, and include a “blue link” to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you.

Do not override preexisting disambiguation pages with an article of your own. For example, you may title your article “Sunil Gupta (doctor)” and then add your article to the disambiguation page.

Feel free to read about the Manual of Style as it will help make your articles look Wikipedia-ready. Ecourter (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sunil Gupta (Doctor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 11:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

okay, how to edit, this is normal article to doctor Nagpurjournalism (talk) 11:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nagpurjournalism. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nagpurjournalism. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nagpurjournalism|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 11:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]