User talk:NewestPiano: Difference between revisions

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Canterbury Tail talk 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which page? NewestPiano (talk) 23:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft you were making for the 74 building, was mostly lifted directly from the sales marketing on their website. You cannot lift text from the internet like that, it’s a copyright violation. Canterbury Tail talk 11:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NewestPiano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NewestPiano. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Synthetic Watermelon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NewestPiano. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Synthetic Watermelon“.

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 18:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to East River Houses. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:41, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh NewestPiano (talk) 01:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @NewestPiano, I know having an article draftified can be discouraging, but yours just needs some more sources that adequately establish the subject’s notability.

Have a read of WP:NBUILDING, which describes the notability guideline for buildings, andWP:GNG which describes the general notability guideline.

The subject of the article must meet one of these guidelines for it to qualify for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If it does, ensure you cite the sources that establish this.

Let me know if you have any further questions, and thanks for your contributions 🙂 SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York City Housing Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astoria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NewestPiano. Thank you for your work on Fort Washington Ave Rehab. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not ready for main space. Please add more sources – primarily secondary sources – and establish WP:Note. I will be moving the article to draft space. Please feel free to re-publish once it satisfies the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What the. NewestPiano (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NewestPiano. Thank you for your work on Lafayette Gardens. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add secondary sources and show coverage to establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t create TFAs at you did here, here and here. It is a process undertaken by the TFA coordinators and needs to involve Featured Articles only. Should you wish to nominate a featured article to become TFA, please use the process as outlined at WP:TFAR. – SchroCat (talk) 05:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry… I am NewestPiano (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page McKinley Houses has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was meant to be a draft in first place, I just forgot to do it here. I am NewestPiano (talk) 03:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Marcus Garvey Houses has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it, so? I am NewestPiano (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Webster Houses has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh, I moved it. I am NewestPiano (talk) 12:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry for being 6 days late. I am NewestPiano (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheepshead Bay Houses, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheepshead Bay Houses until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you’ve significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Now the deletion has been withdrawn. I am NewestPiano (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

East River Houses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]