User talk:Niccommon: Difference between revisions

Hello, I’m Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. … discospinster _talk 00:37, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which edit? Niccommon (talk) 00:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one. … discospinster _talk 00:40, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that is fair honestly, you think i am a little bit right though on the inside? Niccommon (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Margarida Corceiro, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. EdhyRa (talk) 10:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology), as you did at Margarida Corceiro, you may be blocked from editing. Day Creature (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain reasoning, how could we use AI to type out a date? This was hand typed, not even copied and pasted. This allegation is baseless. Niccommon (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See the “utm_source=chatgpt.com” present in the URLs of the citation you added, indicating your use of ChatGPT. If you not only use AI chatbots to edit but don’t even realize that it might be smart to remove the “source=chatgpt.com” from the URLs it spits out at you, I’m afraid you likely lack the competence to edit here. Day Creature (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help, that’s great. Niccommon (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]