Please do not develop article/draft content on this page, and certainly do not submit this page for pre-publication review at AfC. This is your personal talk page, intended for communicating with other users, and for various information and warning messages to be posted for you. You have an existing draft in the system, at [[Draft:Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan]], please work on that instead. — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 10:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Please do not develop article/draft content on this page, and certainly do not submit this page for pre-publication review at AfC. This is your personal talk page, intended for communicating with other users, and for various information and warning messages to be posted for you. You have an existing draft in the system, at [[Draft:Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan]], please work on that instead. — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 10:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Dr. Pavithra Guru R|Dr. Pavithra Guru R]] (February 7) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Fermiboson was:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs to <br />
* meet any of the ”[[WP:Notability (academics)|eight academic-specific criteria]]”
* ”’or”’ cite multiple [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth <br />
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–
—
–> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Absolutely no evidence of [[WP:NPROF]] at all, only that he is an academic that exists. Assistant professors are highly unlikely to be notable on an academic basis alone.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Dr. Pavithra Guru R]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Dr._Pavithra_Guru_R ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fermiboson&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dr._Pavithra_Guru_R ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
[[User:Fermiboson|Fermiboson]] ([[User talk:Fermiboson|talk]]) 10:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
Hello, Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was User:Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan, which appears to be a draft of an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.
As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn’t expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia’s definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don’t hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! QwertyForest (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Please note that your user page is not allowed to be in any categories that file it alongside articles in mainspace, per WP:USERNOCAT. It may only be filed in categories for Wikipedia editors’ user pages, and may not be filed in any categories that treat it like an article. As I’ve already had to remove the page from mainspace categories twice in just 90 minutes, do not readd it to mainspace categories again. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Your sandbox page, which I’ve now had to remove from categories four times, is also not allowed to be in any mainspace categories either, per the same rule. Do not readd that to categories again either, and note that I’ll be immediately deleting the page and/or blocking your edit privileges completely if I have to continue removing it from categories. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EatingCarBatteries were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 05:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
|
Hello, Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 05:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
- “Thank you for the feedback. I have updated the draft to focus on independently verifiable records, including granted UK Design Patents (Nos. 6297329, 6472447) and published academic monographs with ISBNs, which meet the criteria for academic notability (WP:NPROF).” Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Please do not develop article/draft content on this page, and certainly do not submit this page for pre-publication review at AfC. This is your personal talk page, intended for communicating with other users, and for various information and warning messages to be posted for you. You have an existing draft in the system, at Draft:Pavithra Guru Ramakrishnan, please work on that instead. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fermiboson was:
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
