User talk:Pierre Bon-Bon: Difference between revisions

Line 165: Line 165:

::Yes I know, the clean-up its about the edits made by him… Let me know what you want to do, if you’re going to check everything I’ll leave it to you, otherwise I’m going to revert all the dubious edits restoring the previous version. –[[User:Friniate|”’Friniate”']] [[User talk:Friniate| ✉ ]] 17:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

:::I am not an Italian speaker, so it would be quite difficult for me to verify the sources. Which dubious edits are you referring to? [[User:Pierre Bon-Bon|Pierre Bon-Bon]] ([[User talk:Pierre Bon-Bon#top|talk]]) 18:49, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

::::All the edits made by Camoz on that article (and the sources added by him). –[[User:Friniate|”’Friniate”']] [[User talk:Friniate| ✉ ]] 18:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources need to be independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pierre Bon-Bon!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pierre Bon-Bon! We’re so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

— 17:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello 🙂 I saw that you went through the dead-end pages and added some wikilinks, thanks for doing that. A useful tip for the dead-end pages is that sometimes they have no links because someone with a conflcit of interest has recently rewritten the whole article, so it’s alwasy good to check the page history to see if that’s the case and you can restore the previous version. — NotCharizard ^🗨 15:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the information. I’m always hesitant to revert versions and flag COI issues, but I’ll keep this in mind for future edits. Thanks again! Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was interesting to talk to you. I have updated your user rights, as we discussed. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! Thank you for revising my user rights and for the helpful advice you gave me on Sunday. I hope to see you again soon. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Allen (painter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

It was great to meet you at the Lambeth event. Thanks for the fixes on the cheese page!

It looks like your editing is going strong. If you ever want a second opinion on an edit or a page going through AFC, feel free to message me via my talk page, or ping me by adding {{U|Medievalfran}} to your message.

Happy editing! Medievalfran (talk) 00:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Medievalfran!

It was nice to meet you too. Thank you for your message, I’ll definitely keep that in mind.

See you soon! Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Louis-Philippe Dury, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Asef Ahang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afghan.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spring Break Fiji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pierre Bon-Bon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosemead Preparatory School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Alin Jose Perera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — NotCharizard ^🗨 06:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Curdworth, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you take care of this, following MOS? Talk:Giorgia Meloni#who she said, “with the boards of their own examples, built the ladder that today allows me to climb and break the heavy glass ceiling placed over our heads”. Thanks. ~2026-20937-5 (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’ve added the comma as you suggested, but I didn’t include the colon before the quotation because the latter doesn’t form a complete sentence on its own. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, mea culpa. I’ve corrected the mistake so it should be good. By the by, please remember to sign your messages so I can reply to them. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Regarding the comma, it should be added after “women”, sorry.

Thanks: [1]. After “who she said”, can you put a colon instead of a comma (MOS:QUOTE)? Also, can you put a comma after “women”, for flow? Thanks.

What do you think of this sentence? According to MOS:QUOTE, should the period be after the quotation mark or not? that “Unlike Thatcher’s emphasis on economic freedoms, and unlike modern feminism’s insistence on rights and recognition, Meloni grounds her conservatism in a deeper sense of duty […] a vision of womanhood that is not a repudiation of tradition, but its vindication”. Can you answer me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-35031-2 (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the full stop should be placed before the quotation mark. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please correct it? You’re very good.

Done, tell me what you think of the edit. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 19:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

While we’re on this topic, could you please write “criticised” instead of “criticized”, according to the Template:Use British English in the article?

I’ve amended the American spellings to British English. Let me know if you find any other inconsistencies. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 08:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I noticed you’re doing Wikipedia:Cleanup. In the Giorgia Meloni article, since La7 should never be italicized, could you correct it in reference 347 by removing the italics?

Hi, sorry for bothering you, I’m writing you since I’m following this clean-up thread on the AI-Cleanup Wikiproject, and among the articles written by that user (most likely with LLMs) there is also Apulia wine region. I saw that you rewrote part of the article, but, before marking the clean-up as completed, I wanted to ask you if at that time you did check also things like text-source integrity and so on, or if you just rewrote in a better style, etc. I tried to check randomly a passage and for example I can’t find the source of the sentence Soil types range from clay to rocky neither here, here or here, which are the only three mentioned sources. —Friniate ✉ 23:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no bother at all. At the time, I focused on proofreading and reformulating the text and did not verify whether the sources corroborated the information given (as shown here). The references were indeed added by User:Camoz87. Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, the clean-up its about the edits made by him… Let me know what you want to do, if you’re going to check everything I’ll leave it to you, otherwise I’m going to revert all the dubious edits restoring the previous version. —Friniate ✉ 17:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an Italian speaker, so it would be quite difficult for me to verify the sources. Which dubious edits are you referring to? Pierre Bon-Bon (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All the edits made by Camoz on that article (and the sources added by him). —Friniate ✉ 18:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply