User talk:Ponyo: Difference between revisions

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

does it bother you that Jimmy Wales is married to kate Garvey a w*r criminal?. Travis Lee Bailey
User okip and user ikip

Ponyo, if you have a moment, can you keep MTB18 (talk · contribs) away from 2025 Moroccan Gen Z protests? This nonsense with the infobox is out of hand!   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What even is that?? Some sort of AI slop? P-blocked for a week.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:18, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, I noticed you salted the pages Gizelle Bryant and Gizelle A Bryant for persistent sockpuppetry. I created a draft article for Bryant at Draft:Gizelle Bryant, as I do believe she is notable enough for an article. Would you be willing to review the draft and recreate the article? Thanks in advance. Mellamelina (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft you’ve written is very similar to the article that was deleted based on consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizelle Bryant. In fact, the deleted article has even more content and assertions of notability than your draft, so I’m not so sure it would survive another AfD. That being said, the draft is protected against recreation by s specific sock, so if the draft is reviewed and approved I (or another admin) can lower the protection so it can be moved.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, I found your page from a few days ago when you blocked StudDoctor9000 (talk · contribs) for being a sockpuppet (I was involved in the conversation that originally led to the master being blocked). Apologies if I should take this straight to a notice board, but I was wondering if we could get some page protection at Salt Lake City International Airport? There’s an IP editor who, every few days, edits the page with the same edits. The edits are not constructive and I have constantly reverted the edits since the user started doing this, which has been going on for almost 2 years now (here’s one I reverted from October 2023: [1]). I eventually brought it to the talk page over a year ago in June 2024 (seen here: [2]) which eventually led to the page being protected for 2 months [3]. This stopped the IP for a bit, but they eventually started up their edits again this past May [4] and have been doing it consistently ever since. I’ve left constant talk page messages and warnings on several of the IPs, but the user never responds and they have never once used an edit summary. Just wondering what you think would be the best way to have this handled or if we can get the page protected again (for longer this time if possible). Again, I apologize if I should go straight to a notice board, I’m just not sure the best course of action given how long this has been going on. Thanks! (VenFlyer98 (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC))[reply]

The IP range is a small and consistent one (see these contribs) so a partial block would be a simple solution. I was a bit conflicted on this though as it is, at heart, a content dispute. That being said, while there was no consensus for the naming at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 20#Washington National Name, there is a very narrow consensus for the Washington–National link at Talk:Salt Lake City International Airport. As the IP has never made an argument at all for their preferred version, I’ve partial blocked the range from the article.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:41, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Ponyo, at Dalal (surname), I have reverted this edit: [5] which you can see at [6], but for some reason, the history shows the revert has been undone, even when it was not (maybe because of removing the references header at [7].) Can you fix it please? Thanks, ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 22:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t change automatic filter log notes.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo is there someone who can? ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverted part of your own edit, so the filter tag is correct. There is no reason to remove it – it has no impact on anything.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Thought you should be aware that it appears User:AreyanT101 is block evading with this edit. I’m not particularly interested in playing whack-a-mole with however many IPs this person will inevitably use, so I’ve requested temporary ECP. GSK (talk • edits) 02:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I see that ToBeFree has amended the block.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was independently of any block evasion. I just think they should be required to create an unblock request and thought you might have been afraid of blocking indefinitely in response to someone reverting you. Thanks for the ping! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo! I see you regularly revert this longtime bugger who originally edited as User:Abdulaziz999982 and later resorted to socks. Can you please use your powers and check if these three accounts User:BDN2, User:BD85 and User:Marzst are somehow the same person? Because like in Deidré Laurens, the IP i mentioned edited in which they changed the subject title due to a move which was very recently done by BDN2, resulting in a revert by myself due to being arbitrary and lacked consensus for the new title. Thankyou. zoglophie^•talk• 16:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More : Look here, their edits are one after another, changing names without any consensus in the respective talk pages of the subjects. Same in 2024 African Badminton Championships page history. I’m sure there are many more examples which definitely prove both of them are actually the same and longtime vandal Abdul. zoglophie^•talk• 02:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoglophie: could you please start an SPI oulining the suspected accounts and the evidence? A Clerk will review and action follow-up in necessary.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ponyo,

On behalf of the Kwara State University Wikimedia Fan Club, I would like to request review and unblocking of one of our members’ accounts on wikipedia.
Her accounts appear to have been blocked, and we believe this may have happened unintentionally. This user is active contributor in Wikimedia projects and members of our university club

User:Grace0011
We sincerely appreciate your time and support, and we assure you that our team will continue to uphold Wikimedia’s guidelines and standards going forward. Pet002 (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002: There was no error in the blocking, and the reason for the block is noted on Grace0011’s user talk page. Grace0011 was incorrectly linking hundreds upon hundreds of common terms contrary to Wikipedia’s Manual of Style. This was brought to their attention repeatedly, including with a short-term block, yet they continued without responding to any of the concerns raised by fellow editors. The path forward to an unblock is for Grace0011 to post an appeal on their talk page that demonstrates an understanding as to why they were blocked and will communicate with others when concerns are raised, as is required on this collaborative project. This is further explained at WP:GAB.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo,

Thank you for this information

Is it on her talk page or somewhere else? Pet002 (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002:, you can find the information here.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 18:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LuniZunie: Are you sure that you hit send? Nothing has come through on my side.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure, are you part of oversight? The mail was sent there. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 18:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That will go through OTRS. You don’t need to provide email notifications when emailing the oversight team as it will show up in the queue automatically.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Apologies for that then. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 19:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem!– Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You recently placed a CU block on 2A00:1370:8186:3825:F8D8:A280:79A3:63F8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Allow me to point out this duck, 128.71.94.4 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), (diffs: [8], [9]) and also 2607:740:27:0:9B2E:9D65:19F7:F56B (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (diffs: [10], [11]) Geogene (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both blocked; I’ll look at some semi-protections as well.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Geogene (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ponyo, Please kindly check User talk:Grace0011 and Help her with neccessary stepss, Thank You. Pet002 (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002: I’ve already followed up there and left a question this morning that has not yet been answered.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check out 2600:1010:B212:7235:4CB7:8F50:5B0B:AD27? – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 20:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i noticed that you have blocked sockpuppets, however, you are putting this template on the bottom of the page, which is WRONG. Next time, put this template on a section that says “December 2025”. On AquilatorG10’s talk page you put the template on a completely unreleated topic! 🧀 CheeseGuy 🧀 11:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CheeseGuy164: Now you wouldn’t happen to be AquilatorG10, would you? Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 11:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged and blocked by another admin as 14 novembre. —Yamla (talk) 11:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked 128.4.0.0/16 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) after my report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5/Archive#12 September 2025 – the rangeblock expired and I think the Andrew5 activity continues to be obvious (and started up almost immediately after the expiration). Not sure if I should go to SPI again. wizzito | say hello! 02:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you also look at the history of Tropical Storm Mario (2025). wizzito | say hello! 02:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You’re receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was about to warn User:BACHIR0000000000009999999999999999999NINIPATALOPATALOPOPOLOLOMOMOABDEL666666K77777777 for the ef stuff they got into. -Flower 24.155.147.109 (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you were a step ahead. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 22:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I saw your message, starting digging through their contribs, and other StayCalmOnTress socks kept popping up in the histories. So you were the one ahead, I just caught up!– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:31, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See 190.100.199.185 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) who requested redirects related children’s TV shows. S0091 (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; now blocked.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now at temp account ~2025-32451-38 contribs (not sure how link TAs like I used to with IPs?). There’s a couple IPs associated with them. S0091 (talk) 21:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to EvergreenFir for the assist.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m reaching out with a suggestion.The Women’s Handball World Championship is approaching, and I’ve noticed that the main article contains quite a few inaccuracies. Specifically, the medal table separates countries in a way that contradicts how the IHF presents them in its official bulletins. The IHF recognizes certain countries as successors to the results of former, now non-existent nations, and this is confirmed in all of their official publications and presentations.
The current table, as it stands, is not shown or available anywhere as an official source. I have created a revised table modeled after FIFA and UEFA competitions (since the situation is identical in handball), with all relevant references included. I would like to publish it, if you agree. However, if you have any other suggestions or advice, I’d be glad to help. Based on suggestions and advice (since I’m new to this whole system), I also wrote on the talk page, but I don’t think anyone will respond.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportopedia (talk • contribs)

I’ve come across two accounts, both opened the same day, both making similar biased edits to BLPs of politicians. Should I report them at SPI? Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found the puppet master. I feel like a detective! Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Yes, report it under the oldest account’s name. — Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo – according to the talk page of ~2025-31835-56 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), at 19:57, 14 November 2025 you blocked that TA from editing List of Rajasthani-language films for a period of 2 weeks. However, at 18:32, 15 November 2025 that editor edited List of Rajasthani-language films – it appears your block is not actually working ? – Arjayay (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the actual article I meant to block the TA from wasn’t entered correctly (which is why the block log states “specified non-editing actions” instead of “List of Rajasthani-language films”. Perhaps a kind admin can fix my mistake? @Drmies: perhaps (who appears to be online)? It would save me using one of my scratch codes and I would be grateful!–AlsoPonyo (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hope I got it right—I’m doing this on my phone. Porter is looking at my screen but he’s not very helpful. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a more helpful porter (but perhaps not for editing on your phone). I’m going to need a beer to clean up Frederieke Saeijs; I think maybe the bot expanded the refs into the embedded links in the article? The article appears to have been written by the subject and is quite a mess. I could also just throw my hands up and go read a book. I have let it be known that I’m quite lazy.–AlsoPonyo (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may owe me a porter. Oh, my colleague lent me a book by Walker Percy. Apparently it contains urinal etiquette, which my boss should probably study. Drmies (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May possibly be related? [12] Thanks. ~2025-32692-02 (talk) 03:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what I did to get blocked? I had to look up what sockpuppeting even meant. what did I do that made it look like I was trying to evade a ban? Maberjay (talk) 17:31, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Maberjay: Your account has never been blocked. What makes you think that you were?– Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:07, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

maybe it was my IP address? sorry, I’m not tryna waste your name, it doesn’t seem like anything is actually wrong. i’m still pretty new to navigating Wikipedia. I appreciate that you replied so fast tho Maberjay (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like whatever it was has sorted itself out.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:56, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe they are back under the name TGSmith01; the same pattern of behaviour is exhibited across their edits. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not so sure. ZL’s main focus is reality TV shows and the individuals who appear on them, with some interest in soaps. They often pick somewhat unique usernames The edits by TGSmith01 don’t quite align with what I typically see. Perhaps you could add a report with diffs to SPI? — Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I came across some new accounts which have been created in November 2025. All of them have similar usernames and all of them edit Bengali entertainment related articles. But, no two of them have edited the same page. Each of them have 1-10 edits overall. (No vandalism though)

1.~2025-31305-81

2.~2025-34956-20

3.~2025-35012-17

4.~2025-32686-72

5.~2025-31697-88

I didn’t tag them….cuz I wasn’t sure. So, can you please just tell me that if these kind of usernames are common or not….Is it a Wikipedia feature that new users are getting these kind of usernames?….Or it could be a banned user trying to edit via multiple accounts.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those are temporary accounts. IPs are no longer publicly shown. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 07:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! I didn’t knew about temporary accounts. Thought ’em to be vandals. BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know of an edit that you may want to look at for Barbara Blegen. A revert you made on 23 October 2025 for sockpuppetry of edits by 204.84.113.251 (talk · contribs) has been basically redone by one of the new temporary accounts, ~2025-35661-43 (talk · contribs), including the wording “the The New York Times” that drew my attention to it the first time around. They’ve also edited, and submitted to afc, the article Draft:Jared Miller (composer) that 204.84.113.251 had worked on as well. I’m suspecting that it might be the same person back around again, but I don’t know the name of the original account to refer to that. Orxenhorf (talk) 03:50, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I’ve blocked the temp account as an obvious sock and semi-protected the target articles.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:24, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 🙂 I noticed you removed the latest username the LTA used at Izno’s talk page. Just a heads-up: looks like the edit summary from my revert automatically repeated that username, so if you want to supress it you may also need to supress my two edit summaries. Take care! tony 20:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. When I revert edits from accounts with abusive names I generally revert directly back to the previous version instead of using rollback or undo as it prevebts the username from being repeated in the edit summary. Not always quick or practical to do so though.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ponyo,

When you “nuke” an editor’s articles, like for User:Dylanisajet99, unfortunately you neglect to delete their talk pages. Right now, there are over 440+ article talk pages that need to be deleted. I believe there is a checkbox when you use Nuke which you can tag to also delete also talk pages and redirects. I usually take care of these when editors use the Nuke feature, but it’s Thanksgiving here and this is over 400 pages! You think you can get to all of these orphaned talk pages today? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s odd Liz, I was certain I clicked the “delete associated talk page” option. It’s why I included the note “talk pages deleted as WP:CSD#G8” in my rationale, in addition to the G5 notice, as most of the talk pages were created by someone other than the sock account. Maybe something went wrong due to the size of the deletion batch? I’ll take a look.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:39, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got through a fair chunk of them but the rest will have to wait as I have to jet (ironically). Other than hanging around in a backlog, they’re doing no harm until I can get the rest. Happy Thanksgiving!– Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think perhaps Explicit batch deleted the rest? I was going to strart working through them one by one this morning but they’re all gone.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:26, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ponyo–I guess I missed the action, and User:Qazphynux/sandbox is viable content for the next six months if left unedited? WP:UPNOT doesn’t help either–we can not delete, but can we blank nonsense like this? Drmies (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surely csd 6 or 7 apply? Certainly a non contributor Doug Weller talk 18:48, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller all of them now have “last edited six months ago” in the conditions. I have no idea where that came from. It’s a terrible idea. Drmies (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See my post here.[Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion#6 months criteria]. Doug Weller talk 19:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies There was a degree of pearl cluching concern about biting and such, so now we have a six-month rolling period of hosting gobs of self-promotion and other crud on the servers. The Everything Must Stay vs. Everything Must Go pendulum keeps swinging from one drastic peak to the other.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:50, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ha–but I have to say, I’ve never seen it swing that other way… Did we just buy up an old server park somewhere that we can host all this BS? Drmies (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there’s this. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bots are the admins of the future. The future is now.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:55, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the response to my suggestion was, well, curt. Doug Weller talk 18:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Byron Comp 3 is continuing the same edits as they were pre-block without any communication. Also socked at Special:Contributions/Angela Comp. Left something in my edit summary reverting them to see their talk page, but unsure how effective this will be. Figured I’d let you know as the blocking admin. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 03:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Byron Comp 3. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this was all handles via SPI.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo,

How are you doing, I just wanted to ask you on the rules of recreation of this article due to it being taking down so many times for sock puppeting I wanted to know if it was possible to recreate and is there any advice. I’ve been trying to work on actors with or building a name and this subject came across my interest. So I wanted to know the rules don’t want to cross any lines. Lopsd (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:McKinzie Scott has been declined twice. I would suggest getting the draft in acceptable shape before looking to create an article.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or even better, stop socking.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry to bother! I just want to ask, was User:Harringstars being a sock of User:Your Local Italian confirmed via CheckUser? I am asking because Your Local Italian has created ~175 sockpuppet accounts on the Minecraft Wiki, and we have a suspicious user who has Harringstars linked on his userpage. I am so sorry if this is something I shouldn’t be asking! Amethyst hhh (talk) 08:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The technical evidence leans towards the account being either Your Local Italian or 14 novembre. I didn’t bother to dig too deeply.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:26, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you! amethyst_hhh ^(talk) 08:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HI, it is regarding this user who was blocked for a period of 48 hrs on 27 November for edit warring. They have resorted edit warring again today [13], removing the same stuff, without any discussion in the talk page. Also did the same in this article. Have a look. Regrds. – Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for a week and logged at WP:AELOG/2025#SA. Next step is an idef, I think.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. – Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:59, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A week ago you partial-blocked a big /43 range from a large list of articles. I just wanted to point out that significant previous blocks exist for this person while they were using other internet methods. Here’s a case where the two methods intersected.[14][15]

I think of this person as being focused on Angelina Ballerina and Lily’s Driftwood Bay and Poppy Cat[16] but of course they have many other targets. They were blocked for three years for hoaxing but that expired a few weeks ago.

Maybe I should draw up a page about this at WP:Long-term abuse. Binksternet (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: I’ve added a few articles/userpages to the block, but the range has been blocked by many different admins over the past three years (full block log here). I believe there are at least two LTAs bouncing around this range; @Drmies: was the last admin to site-block the range.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked ~2025-34716-38 and the underlying IP, and banreverted this edit by them at Lesley Joseph. Now ~2025-37784-27 has made the same edit again, and TAIV geolocation information indicates they are likely to be the same user.

Also could you clue me in as to who this editor is? fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t connect IPs or TAs to registered accounts without my bits being removed forcibly and without anesthesia. — Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:58, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Ponyo. Please. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; the comment was made without due consideration of others.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:23, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Hope you are doing good, im requesting for you to undelete Clara Stack which you deleted (G5), i wanted to improve the article and rewrite it, and it will help me, PLEASE ping me because i might not get the notification and i will forget to check cus im at work. Destinyokhiria 💬 07:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Destinyokhiria:, there is no protection on the article, you are free to start a new article at any time.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:01, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, I am coming to you not because you are a CU but because you are familiar with their behaviour and this involves TA/IPs. Please take a look at Black Cat (2020 comic) and the TA that created it and their underlying IP ( (I did reject the draft but they removed the reject so someone else accepted it). You’ll see you blocked the earliest TA but not the IP so they kept using it (not a complaint). Ninja did block that IP back in 2023 for 3 months. All the subsequent TAs/IPs who edited the draft/article are also TTT24 so I think the article should be G5’d. Sorry, I wish I could be more transparent and provide convenience links, etc. but fear violating the TAIV rules. If you prefer me filing an SPI, let me know.

This whole TA thing is a mess. It creates so .much. more. work. and allows so much more abuse. I haven’t even been around that much since its implementation but even with my little experience, I am starting to believe that both the TA and IP in most cases should be blocked. Ugh! S0091 (talk) 21:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it per CSDG5 and protected the page. And yes, the TA thing is a nightmare. — Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think TAs will eventually lead to banning non-registered users, something I would have struggled with before TAs but now would support without blinking an eye. S0091 (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good to see you clearing up after a couple of Vanderpumpstan socks overnight. I’d flagged a lot of their SPA Commons uploads recently (celebrity photos and signatures taken from other websites which they claim to have obtained themselves, often claiming to be a close relative), which they seem to be trying to keep separate from Wikipedia by not adding the photos directly from the same registered account.

Could you cast your eye over commons:User:Loosjxjeloz on Commons (which includes a Jaden Ladega signature), if the LTA is fresh in your mind? No worries if not, I’ll get a formal SPI together over there when I have the time. Belbury (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of my super powers translate over to Commons, and the Loosjxjeloz account isn’t registred here, so I’m not sure what I can do to help? — Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, didn’t realise. I’ll SPI it at Commons at some point, then. Belbury (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you can help delete my user page and apply protection for autoconfirmed accounts only. Thanks! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@P. ĐĂNG: I think it’s set up how you want it now. Let me know if any changes are needed.– Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good now. Thanks again! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 04:33, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

does it bother you that Jimmy Wales is married to kate Garvey a w*r criminal?. Travis Lee Bailey
User okip and user ikip ~2025-38154-29 (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]