User talk:Porpisith: Difference between revisions

:What “company” are you part of? — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 07:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

:What “company” are you part of? — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 07:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

::LD Entertainment KH [[User:Porpisith|Porpisith]] ([[User talk:Porpisith#top|talk]]) 07:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

::LD Entertainment KH [[User:Porpisith|Porpisith]] ([[User talk:Porpisith#top|talk]]) 07:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

:::Yes, that was quite obvious all along, I just wanted you to say it so we have it on record. This was queried a year ago, why have you not responded to that query, and more to the point why haven’t you disclosed this?

:::You <u>are</u> a paid editor (hitherto, [[WP:UPE|an ”undisclosed” paid editor]]) when writing about your employer and/or subjects related to it, regardless of whether you are explicitly paid to edit Wikipedia. You have been violating a major section of our terms and conditions all this time, by not disclosing your paid-editing-status, and by creating content in the main encyclopaedia which you are not allowed to do.

:::Now that you know that, you must address that point clearly in your next appeal, should you lodge one. — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 07:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Porpisith! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Resubmitted without any meaningful improvement, previous decline still stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Porpisith, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I’ve been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Neath’s Love Story: Post Angkor Youth to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you’ve already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It’s a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here.
~Liance^talk 23:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Also weirdly worded – Skyline Media will be stationed … including their latest … and THE RITUAL SOUL. Is this about the company or movie?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

”'[[User:CanonNi]]”’ (talk • contribs) 09:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it’s a movie. Porpisith (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by B.Korlah was:

Thank you for editing Wikipedia, however the concerns raised by the previous reviewer are not met yet, please review and check again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

B.Korlah (talk) 20:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Ritual Soul (2024 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and See the reasons the draft was previously declined. The film is perhaps notable, but this article does not show that it is..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit for review” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 13:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Porpisith. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. .

What is your connection to Leak Lyda? bonadea contributions talk 13:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prince of Erebor was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since the last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 04:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mannequin Wedding. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Porpisith. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ritual Soul (2024 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ritual Soul (2024 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ritual Soul (2024 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mannequin Wedding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannequin Wedding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Porpisith. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angkor DC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prince of Erebor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 04:50, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junior Camper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Camper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hotel 2005, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. TURKEYDICAE🦃 17:25, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

Blocked submitter, article is incredibly short, and apparent copyvio

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, nobody is paying me for this promote. I only do it because I am part of the company.” Porpisith (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What “company” are you part of? — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LD Entertainment KH Porpisith (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was quite obvious all along, I just wanted you to say it so we have it on record. This was queried a year ago, why have you not responded to that query, and more to the point why haven’t you disclosed this?

You are a paid editor (hitherto, an undisclosed paid editor) when writing about your employer and/or subjects related to it, regardless of whether you are explicitly paid to edit Wikipedia. You have been violating a major section of our terms and conditions all this time, by not disclosing your paid-editing-status, and by creating content in the main encyclopaedia which you are not allowed to do.

Now that you know that, you must address that point clearly in your next appeal, should you lodge one. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]