User talk:Princenile1234: Difference between revisions

Line 90: Line 90:

== Blocked as a sockpuppet ==

<div class=”user-block” style=”padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(–border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px”>[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style=”margin-left:45px”>You have been ”'[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]”’ ”'[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]”’ from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of {{no ping|1=Princenile|label1=User:Princenile}} per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Princenile]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but ”’not for ”[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]” reasons”’, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style=”margin-left:45px”>If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia’s [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!– Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. –><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>.  [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 04:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)</div></div><!– Template:uw-sockblock –>

{{~~unblock~~-un|1=Princenile2009|reason=<small>The following request was written through the [[Wikipedia:Unblock wizard|unblock wizard]].</small>{{pb}}

{{-un|1=Princenile2009|reason=<small>The following request was written through the [[Wikipedia:Unblock wizard|unblock wizard]].</small>{{pb}}

””’Please list all accounts you have used besides this one.””'{{pb}}

Princenile, Princenile1234{{pb}}

Line 97: Line 97:

””’Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?””'{{pb}}

No{{pb}}

[[User:Princenile1234|Princenile1234]] ([[User talk:Princenile1234#top|talk]]) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)}}

[[User:Princenile1234|Princenile1234]] ([[User talk:Princenile1234#top|talk]]) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <em>or</em>

*the block is no longer necessary because you:

*#understand what you have been blocked for,

*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

*#will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 04:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)}}

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NASTRONOMY, needs more than a rather trivial listing in one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Lynch 44 03:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Princenile1234!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lynch 44 03:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NASTRONOMY, needs more than a rather trivial listing in one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Lynch 44 03:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NASTRONOMY, needs more than a rather trivial listing in one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Lynch 44 03:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NASTRONOMY, needs more than a rather trivial listing in one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Lynch 44 03:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply