User talk:Ramhthewatermelon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 16: Line 16:

I’m sorry if it seems like I’m rushing but it appears that this appeal has stalled. The lack of response from {{u|Primefac}} is strange. I want this block to be reviewed because the basis of the block is incorrect, {{u|Primefac}} has yet to mention it here and I hope they will because I haven’t got a clue as to how to make this appeal get through. [[User:Ramhthewatermelon|Ramhthewatermelon]] ([[User talk:Ramhthewatermelon#top|talk]]) 21:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

I’m sorry if it seems like I’m rushing but it appears that this appeal has stalled. The lack of response from {{u|Primefac}} is strange. I want this block to be reviewed because the basis of the block is incorrect, {{u|Primefac}} has yet to mention it here and I hope they will because I haven’t got a clue as to how to make this appeal get through. [[User:Ramhthewatermelon|Ramhthewatermelon]] ([[User talk:Ramhthewatermelon#top|talk]]) 21:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

:{{NAcmt}} Your appeal is in the [[CAT:UNB|queue of unblock requests]], but it is only one of many such requests. Like every other Wikipedia user, administrators are [[WP:VOLUNTEER|volunteers]], with many tasks to perform and only their spare time in which to do them. There is no set order to which requests are reviewed, nor is there any [[WP:SLA|time promised or guaranteed]] for a resolution. Your request may be in the queue for days, or even weeks, before it is reviewed. Until then, there is nothing for you to do except be patient and wait your turn. –[[User:Drm310|Drm310]] <span style=”color:red”>🍁</span> ([[User talk:Drm310|talk]]) 21:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 21:46, 2 December 2025

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Ramhthewatermelon, belongs to a different individual. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia’s username policy .Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

  • To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
  • If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Before requesting a new username, you should check if it’s available first. To do this, simply click here and enter the username into the search field. If the search returns, “There is no global account for [username]”, that means the username you entered is available.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia’s username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ramhthewatermelon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am this individual, my username is not in violation of anything because I am this person. [[User:Ramhthewatermelon|Ramhthewatermelon]] ([[User talk:Ramhthewatermelon#top|talk]]) 14:32, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am this individual, my username is not in violation of anything because I am this person. [[User:Ramhthewatermelon|Ramhthewatermelon]] ([[User talk:Ramhthewatermelon#top|talk]]) 14:32, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am this individual, my username is not in violation of anything because I am this person. [[User:Ramhthewatermelon|Ramhthewatermelon]] ([[User talk:Ramhthewatermelon#top|talk]]) 14:32, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Primefac What is the basis of the block? 331dot (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry if it seems like I’m rushing but it appears that this appeal has stalled. The lack of response from Primefac is strange. I want this block to be reviewed because the basis of the block is incorrect, Primefac has yet to mention it here and I hope they will because I haven’t got a clue as to how to make this appeal get through. Ramhthewatermelon (talk) 21:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Your appeal is in the queue of unblock requests, but it is only one of many such requests. Like every other Wikipedia user, administrators are volunteers, with many tasks to perform and only their spare time in which to do them. There is no set order to which requests are reviewed, nor is there any time promised or guaranteed for a resolution. Your request may be in the queue for days, or even weeks, before it is reviewed. Until then, there is nothing for you to do except be patient and wait your turn. —Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version