User talk:RevampedEditor: Difference between revisions

GiantSnowman 19:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I don’t know what’s up with swapping the infobox layout, but the one you’re leaning towards is objectively harder and more confusing to access when editing the page. If you look at all popular footballer pages (Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar, etc.), you’ll see that they all have the same infobox layout. What’s the point in doing it your way? VasilT (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my humble opinion, those examples you cite (and again, Ronaldo and Messi as examples for everything, wiki or not, kind of tiring to be honest) seem to make for a more scrambled infobox. But hey no worries, nobody owns anything around here! And i apologise for my edit summary, you did not accuse me of REMOVING but REVERTING; i did revert, but it was in good faith.

Attentively RevampedEditor (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I’m bringing them up because they are pages that receive more attention in general and are expected to be exemplary. Either way, I wouldn’t say that having each parameter in the infobox on a new line is scrambled, more so the opposite. Thanks and keep up the good work. 🙂 VasilT (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

El pueblo gallego 25/06/1968 https://biblioteca.galiciana.gal/gl/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.do?path=1117185&interno=S&posicion=18&presentacion=pagina

El pueblo gallego 16/09/1969 https://biblioteca.galiciana.gal/gl/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.do?path=1117475&interno=S&posicion=14&presentacion=pagina

El pueblo gallego 16/02/1971 https://biblioteca.galiciana.gal/gl/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.do?path=1117911&interno=S&posicion=20&presentacion=pagina

De GALICIANA BIBLIOTECA DIXITAL DE GALICIA https://biblioteca.galiciana.gal/gl/publicaciones/listar_numeros.do

—Mega60 (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You say [here] that something shouldn’t be 30 sentences that can be said in 3. Okay. So are you going to trim it? Otherwise, add it back, as you’ve just removed a section without reasonings. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, from Portugal,

i apologise for my first summary, a bit heated (the second one was much more encyclopedical). Can’t say i understand the title of your message that much. Yes, that is what i am doing, trim down the wording and improve the language. I repeat again, i have not removed ANYTHING content-wise but the title, which is needless because it’s all part of the main one (“club career”).

Attentively, sorry for any incovenience RevampedEditor (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You removed an entire section without replacing it with anything Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 15:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am lost for words with that reply (but thanks for engaging nonetheless), so here are my final ones: i removed nothing, i replaced a needlessly large sentencing (19 lines) by saying the SAME thing in five (for example, we don’t use stuff like “In a surprising move…” in an encyclopedia; oh, and the user that added the content copied verbatim text from their source, which also goes against the site guidelines). All that while adding a source in English (this one https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/516546/Sepahan-complete-signing-of-Ricardo-Alves) which you removed.

Sad to see we fail to meet eye to eye on the subject. Enjoy the rest of your day. RevampedEditor (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Babysharkboss2 1. The heading for this section is rightly considered confusing by Revamped Editor. Messi may be the only football player you know, but you could at least copied and pasted the name of the title. It’s going to be difficult for people to take this seriously if you appear to not even care what the title of the page was that you were reverting on. From what I see of your user page, you like albums, just imagine someone wanted to discuss a discrepancy on Until This Shakes Apart and titled it “Dark Side of the Moon or something idk”. I got admonished by an admin for putting a meme video link in a heading, so I should know. [1]

2. The version you restored had the “Complaint against the Iranian Football League Organization to FIFA” section, which merely duplicated what was already in the page, just in 1,000 more opinionated words. Let’s imagine I looked at the “Critical reception” section of Until This Shakes Apart, and created a new section afterwards called “Reviews” which just made the quotes ten times longer. You would remove my addition, of course. If you say you don’t know “soccor” [2] and you appear unsure about how much or little should be written about this incident, remember that editing is WP:VOLUNTARY and there are other pages where your knowledge and skills are greatly needed. Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]