From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|
:I did follow the advice of the previous reviewer who seems to think it was good to |
:I did follow the advice of the previous reviewer who seems to think it was good to |
||
|
:go [[User:Rexracer11|Rexracer11]] ([[User talk:Rexracer11#top|talk]]) 22:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC) |
:go [[User:Rexracer11|Rexracer11]] ([[User talk:Rexracer11#top|talk]]) 22:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:I Just went through the page here: [[Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing]] I am not sure how it relates to my submission. I researched the person (who I met several years ago) and personally researched the links to articles and made sure the citations and references were correct and truthful. If there is something else you believe was machine generated please advise because it is my text and I will need to edit (Bizarrely) [[User:Rexracer11|Rexracer11]] ([[User talk:Rexracer11#top|talk]]) 20:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:37, 8 December 2025
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:
…is a British-Canadian adventurer, rally driver, speaker, artificial intelligence developer and former executive in the flying car industry.
Is this really necessary? Just
… is a Canadian [whatever he is primarily known for]
would do.
Also, there are a lot of top-level headings with barely any content, maybe merge them together? (An {{infobox person}} would also be helpful)
Notability is established, so fix these issues and we should be good to go
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- Thank you I did make the updates but somebody else stated that the text looked AI generated. So I am back to editing. I have asked for clarification on any aspect of the article that looks AI generated but I have no response. Do you have nay thoughts for how I could edit my own output to look less like AI? Rexracer11 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Hello, Rexracer11!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2025 (UTC) |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:23, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I drafted the article myself based on the cited sources.
- If any specific sentences appear non-neutral or overly polished, I’m happy to revise them.
- Please feel free to point out any areas that need adjustment.
- I did follow the advice of the previous reviewer who seems to think it was good to
- go Rexracer11 (talk) 22:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- I Just went through the page here: Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing I am not sure how it relates to my submission. I researched the person (who I met several years ago) and personally researched the links to articles and made sure the citations and references were correct and truthful. If there is something else you believe was machine generated please advise because it is my text and I will need to edit (Bizarrely) Rexracer11 (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
