== Account unblocking ==
== Account unblocking ==
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my previous edits may have caused problems. I am not trying to spam or promote anything. I request one chance to contribute constructively. [[User:Rohitjain1402|Rohitjain1402]] ([[User talk:Rohitjain1402#top|talk]]) 15:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |decline = You claim you are not trying to spam or promote anything. That’s obviously false. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 16:59, 27 January 2026 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my previous edits may have caused problems. I am not trying to spam or promote anything. I request one chance to contribute constructively. [[User:Rohitjain1402|Rohitjain1402]] ([[User talk:Rohitjain1402#top|talk]]) 15:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |decline = You claim you are not trying to spam or promote anything. That’s obviously false. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 16:59, 27 January 2026 (UTC)}}
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.
Tips- Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alalch E. was:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Hello, Rohitjain1402!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Alalch E. 10:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC) |
- Hello Alalch, i would like to recreate the page again. The citations and references are 100% authentic and the manner of writing included human intervention. Thankyou! Rohitjain1402 (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m Alalch E.. An article that you recently made, Draft:Pango Financial, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.
Hello Rohitjain1402. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Pango Financial, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rohitjain1402. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rohitjain1402|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —Alalch E. 10:59, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Alalch, thankyou for your reviews. I would like to disclose that i am not an employee/ex-employee or being paid directly or indirectly for this article. Rohitjain1402 (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Pango Financial requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. —Alalch E. 10:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 13:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. I have reviewed Wikipedia’s notability criteria for the organizations and general notability guidelines. Pango Financial has received significant coverage in two Delaware Online (The News Journal) business features, which describe its business model, leadership, and services in depth. Additional mentions in national outlets such as CNBC and Bloomberg also provide company’s relevance in the financial services space.
- Given that these are reliable, independent sources, I believe the subject meets notability guidelines and am respectfully resubmitting for reconsideration. Rohitjain1402 (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I’ve moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Pango Financial. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Rohitjain1402 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that my previous edits may have caused problems. I am not trying to spam or promote anything. I request one chance to contribute constructively. I declare voluntarily that i am not a company employee. I am a freelancer and have been asked to create the wikipedia page for the company. Please unblock my account. I am trying to publish the page going through suggestions by the editor and as per wikipedia requirements. Rohitjain1402 (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
