[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Belbury|Belbury]]. An edit that you recently made to [[:Grokipedia]] seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:RomeoSingh2010/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Belbury|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 15:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Belbury|Belbury]]. An edit that you recently made to [[:Grokipedia]] seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:RomeoSingh2010/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Belbury|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 15:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:West Vinod Nagar]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on [[:West Vinod Nagar]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G15|section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by [[large language model]]s (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any ”reasonable human review”:
* ”’Communication intended for the user”’: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
* ”’Implausible non-existent references”’: This may include external links that are [[Wikipedia:Link rot|dead]] on arrival, [[ISBN]]s with invalid [[checksum]]s, and unresolvable [[Digital Object Identifiers|DOI]]s. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from [[link rot]], a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
* ”’Nonsensical citations”’: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may ”’contest the nomination”’ by [[:West Vinod Nagar|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines]]. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]], and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions.<!– Template:Db-llm-notice –> <!– Template:Db-csd-notice-custom –> [[User:Lovelyfurball|Lovelyfurball]] ([[User talk:Lovelyfurball|talk]]) 16:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello RomeoSingh2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! I’m @Gvihar, your guide. Before you begin, please keep these core policies in mind:
- Verifiability (): Always cite reliable, published sources for any facts you add.
- Neutral point of view (): Write in a balanced, unbiased tone—avoid taking sides.
- No original research (): Only include information that’s already been published elsewhere.
- Civility (): Be respectful and assume good faith when interacting with other editors.
Getting started resources
[edit]
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page: User talk:@Gvihar.
Happy editing! Gvihar 06:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:
We’re sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn’t showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Hello, RomeoSingh2010!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:17, 26 July 2025 (UTC) |
Why are you removing and vandalising V Narayanan wikipedia article. The older image is an updated one clicked in 2025 and it also shows clearly his position as chairman of ISRO. Also you are uploading someone else work the image which you are trying to upload is not your work but you edited the image original image.
https://www.lpsc.gov.in/vnarayanan.html *$EYUO$ (talk) 09:00, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Narwana Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narwana Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iljhgtn (talk) 01:10, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rajkiya Sarvodaya Kanya/Bal Vidhyalaya, West Vinod Nagar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 05:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your Concern!
- I apologize that I’ve used ChatGPT for making of this page because it will be take me long to make page by myself.
- As a newbie Editor, i dont know much about rules and Im deeply apologize that I’ve broke a rule.
- I support your concern and your demand for speedy deletion.
- Thank You!
- Romeo Singh RomeoSingh2010 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi RomeoSingh2010, my name is Foxtrot620, and I am one of the other editors around here. I wanted to reach out here with a little bit more info and context to what’s going on over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narwana Road. I know you mentioned you’re new, and I know Wikipedia has a ton of rules, and people can be a little snippy sometimes. We try to WP:AGF, but sometimes we fall short.
A deletion nom isn’t an attack on you— as much as it feels like one. It doesn’t even necessarily mean you made a mistake. A deletion nom means that somebody felt like an article you created failed to meet one of the standards for pages on Wikipedia. Sometimes these things are fixable, and sometimes they aren’t. If, for example you had created a Wikipedia page about me, you could research it, it could be written wonderfully, and it would still fail WP:NOTE. This is just one of many examples. When you contribute to Wikipedia, (which we are happy that you have decided to do!), you are expected to do your best to obey Wikipedia’s policies and rules. To help you out, I recommend starting here: Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines.
Give it a read through, and keep editing! It’s okay to make mistakes, we fix them, and we hold each other accountable, but just as ignorance of the law is no excuse in a criminal case, ignorance of policy doesn’t absolve the policy violation, and doesn’t make something that otherwise doesn’t belong on Wikipedia appropriate for the medium.
If you have questions, feel free to reach out to me, or any of the other editors who have left you notes! We are all happy to help, and most of us don’t bite!
Foxtrot620 (talk) 03:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m TonySt. I noticed that you recently removed content from Grok (chatbot) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. tony 15:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Grokipedia seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 15:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on West Vinod Nagar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Lovelyfurball (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
