:No worries. Yes, you are right that the sentence appropriation is not for ‘Lead’ section; the same fit within a broader Reception/Criticism structure unless the issue is a major focus of coverage. Hence, I have moved the section under reception. However, avoid direct edit in sensitive, geo-political critics unless you are thorough with Wikipedia policy and rules. [[User:SakuraSmart|SakuraSmart]] ([[User talk:SakuraSmart#top|talk]]) 07:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
:No worries. Yes, you are right that the sentence appropriation is not for ‘Lead’ section; the same fit within a broader Reception/Criticism structure unless the issue is a major focus of coverage. Hence, I have moved the section under reception. However, avoid direct edit in sensitive, geo-political critics unless you are thorough with Wikipedia policy and rules. [[User:SakuraSmart|SakuraSmart]] ([[User talk:SakuraSmart#top|talk]]) 07:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
::Your edit summary [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhurandhar&diff=prev&oldid=1329183801 here] is inappropriate, though the edit itself might not be wrong. ” Heading” means [[MOS:HEAD]] and the policy is for creating section heading like controversy, thought your edit is ok as per [[MOS:FILMLEAD]]. [[User:Sid95Q|Sid95Q]] ([[User talk:Sid95Q|talk]]) 07:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Archive
Hello, this is Icarus. A contributor of Wikipedia. Can you please update the draft article The Best Thing? Because many members of the WikiProject China was no respond on my request, even on its urgent task. Since there is no one should be collaborate, can you do this as much as possible. So, if you’ll interested to expand it with a gathering sources and needs some translations, feel free to ask. Thank you. Icarus 🔭 • 📖 • ✎ 03:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, Thanks for reaching out, but I’m still in learning stage. But whatever I learnt happy to share. Unable to access the direct draft version hence mentioning details here.
- Don’t write article from fan perspective, or bias fluffy exaggerated versions. It’s straight reject.
- Try doing Google search, pick up links mentioning The Best Thing; search with both artists name.
- YT, FB, Blogs, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, Sina, Self media are not acceptable.
- Article is not storytelling but simple neutral formal professional information, so be careful what data you are mentioning
- Chinese link/wikipedia could help for source
- sohu.com
- Refer top left (XA) tab, go to different languages wiki to gain links talking about the topic.
- Seek informations which are best. Refer accepted wikipedia page for reference.
- SakuraSmart (talk) 07:47, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please update for A Love Never Lost, since some references needs to an expansion and overall changes. Remember, any reliable sources (local or foreign) will acceptable. And also, CPOP Home should use as a reliable primary source (when no one attributed source exist) selectively with caution — in terms of fan-oriented entertainment site and some content may unverifiable information [like personal life in biography, controversies, awards, etc.]. My advice is up to you. Take care and may continue for editing. Icarus 🔭 • 📖 • ✎ 00:44, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at fr:Exact name of French article; see its history for attribution.
Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution.
It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 02:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Admin, I was not aware of the attribution part. It’s not the translation, but yes inspiration from it was considered. 6 stories details and reception is new addition. Please review it once again, if required I will add the tag.SakuraSmart (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
The Best Thing (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- Thanks a lot!, this is extremely encouraging. Will explore more to improve my writting. Admin, few of my article creation is not graded, if possible do look into the same. SakuraSmart (talk) 07:46, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
I apologize if my edits on the Dhurandhar article may seem judgmental, as you said here. In reality, I saw the mentioned text regarding the critique of the film and thought that it was better suited for the “Reception” subheading rather than the lead. I can assure you that no political motives were behind my edit. YeedyYaada (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- No worries. Yes, you are right that the sentence appropriation is not for ‘Lead’ section; the same fit within a broader Reception/Criticism structure unless the issue is a major focus of coverage. Hence, I have moved the section under reception. However, avoid direct edit in sensitive, geo-political critics unless you are thorough with Wikipedia policy and rules. SakuraSmart (talk) 07:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
