User talk:ScrabbleTiles: Difference between revisions

Tag: MassMessage delivery

 

Line 207: Line 207:

:Hi there! The idea is based around what is at [[WP:JOKE]]. I’ve seen some funny things before but it can sometimes be strange. It’s just another part of Wikipedia. [[User:ScrabbleTiles|ScrabbleTiles]] ([[User talk:ScrabbleTiles#top|talk]]) 18:31, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

:Hi there! The idea is based around what is at [[WP:JOKE]]. I’ve seen some funny things before but it can sometimes be strange. It’s just another part of Wikipedia. [[User:ScrabbleTiles|ScrabbleTiles]] ([[User talk:ScrabbleTiles#top|talk]]) 18:31, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

::I absolutely cannot forget [[Wikipedia:Don’t stuff beans up your nose/Uh-huh|this]]. Also, sorry if I sounded a bit mean in that message, I wasn’t in the greatest of moods then. [[User:Max the plain text|Max the plain text]] ([[User talk:Max the plain text|talk]]) 20:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

== hello ==

== hello ==

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gaza genocide on a “All RFCs” request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you’d like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:38, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my mentor .how can I create a page —Prince Adebayo Ibrahim Osungbade (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Since you’re a new editor, you’ll have to create a draft article first and then submit it for review. This happens at WP:AFC. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 08:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my previous request to update the image was declind. i am resubmitting the update photo and kindly requsteng a review . the new image are more recent. clear and i am copyright holder and the artist, Thank you! Dilodoxan (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do I hire someone to do my wiki page? —Shanetheaussie (talk) 08:35, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I wouldn’t recommend hiring someone to make you a Wikipedia page, see WP:SCAM. Also, if you are thinking about an autobiography, see WP:AUTO. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 – Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 – SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate’s totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions (“crat chats”).

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 9–15 – SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate’s vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions (“crat chats”).

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ScrabbleTiles, thanks for the message regarding the edit I made on the Ryan Caidic (poet) page. My apologies for missing an edit summary. That was an oversight on my part. The removals were intentional, since categories like Philippine literature refer to works rather than individual authors, so they shouldn’t be applied to a person’s page. The other categories I removed were for similar reasons. Thank you for the reminder, and I’ll make sure to provide clear edit summaries moving forward. ~2025-39689-01 (talk) 10:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scrabble Tiles, I’ve written a Wikipedia entry on the company I work for and it was rejected due to sources and citations. Would you be able to review my draft and help me determine which sources the reviewer may have rejected? Thanks, Hillary —H is for Horticulture (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The reviewer didn’t reject any particular sources, just the article as a whole as they believe the sources you have don’t prove notability of the product. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up question, I see company products listed on other company pages, in the box on the right. However, I cannot find the field to enter products. Do you know where to enter a products? —H is for Horticulture (talk) 20:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to an infobox here. Could you tell me where you saw this and I can then try an help you out. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey- I added a few things to the medical racism wiki after having done research on it in a course. There’s a pop up saying that there’s possible AI- which there most definitely was not. I think it’s because I write in dashes a lot. Should I go back in and edit it so there’s less dashes ? —Cateriely (talk) 17:45, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The article in general is tagged as being possibly being AI generated and has been since August. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:10, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh phew! Thanks ! Cateriely (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ScrabbleTiles!

I recently went ahead and edited the article for the Western Climate Initiative. Among my changes was updating the board of directors and removing Nova Scotia as an active member.

However, that would also mean changing the image of the map to reflect the withdrawal of Nova Scotia. I went ahead and made some note on the talk pages for the article and the file, but is there anything else I can do to get this image changes? (I saw something about requesting and image in another forum, but I am not sure how this is done.)

Please let me know your thoughts when you can!

Thank you,
Knowthebacon —Knowthebacon (talk) 22:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The edits you made look fine. I don’t know where you ask for images to be changed, but I assume it would be somewhere like the Commons Graphics lab. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScrabbleTiles. I hope you don’t mind if I ask this, and I don’t mind if you can’t come up with a good response, but: why are there some parts of Wikipedia that are informal and weird? I thought this when I looked at the page User:Pythoncoder, where it brought me to the Department of Fun and other strange pages. —Max the plain text (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The idea is based around what is at WP:JOKE. I’ve seen some funny things before but it can sometimes be strange. It’s just another part of Wikipedia. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely cannot forget this. Also, sorry if I sounded a bit mean in that message, I wasn’t in the greatest of moods then. Max the plain text (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should have left the article as reviewed so if it does not later pass AFD it gets deleted, so I do not get the need for marking it as unreviewed. Johnnstar (talk) 18:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I marked it as unreviewed as I believe it needs checking further. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well if AFD later results in Keep what then happens, would it be marked again as reviewed Johnnstar (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If a reviewer thinks the article is acceptable, then yes ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top