User talk:Sheraaa2026: Difference between revisions

Line 125: Line 125:

[[User:Bobby Cohn|Bobby Cohn]] 🍁 ([[User talk:Bobby Cohn|talk]]) 19:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

:Hi

:They rejected other one. I can’t believe it that I couldn’t submit this trend on Wiki after 10 days. [[User:Sheraaa2026|Sheraaa2026]] ([[User talk:Sheraaa2026#top|talk]]) 19:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sheraaa2026! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 17:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sheraaa2026!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aesurias was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Aesurias (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LuniZunie was:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 23:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EAKI78 was:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

– EAKI78 – Contact 23:41, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Code intelligence, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey Sheraaa2026, to maintain the history of reviewer comments, I’ve moved the contents of your sandbox to the draft and procedurally resubmitted. Another reviewer will come around to make a decision on it in time. Let me know if you have any questions! (please

mention me on reply; thanks!)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Code intelligence, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They rejected other one. I can’t believe it that I couldn’t submit this trend on Wiki after 10 days. Sheraaa2026 (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply