User talk:Ssvmins: Difference between revisions

Line 57: Line 57:

::::This is highly concerning. Accounts may ”not” be shared by multiple people ”or” affiliated with companies. If this account has been used by multiple people, and is run and able to be accessed by multiple people, I see a realistic path to getting unblocked a difficult one. [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 09:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

:::::Hi,Thanks for your response,i want to clarify that this account is soley used by me,the previously maintained person is no longer with the organization and i am personally managing this account to maintain it responsibly ,i will ensure that i will maintain the contents are neutral and fully compliant and i hope this clarifies the situation. [[User:Ssvmins|Ssvmins]] ([[User talk:Ssvmins#top|talk]]) 09:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

::::::What happens to this account if you leave the company or take different duties at the company that don’t involve editing Wikipedia? [[User:CoffeeCrumbs|CoffeeCrumbs]] ([[User talk:CoffeeCrumbs|talk]]) 14:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

{{unblock-un|1=LPS_Editor|reason=<small>The following request was written through the [[Wikipedia:Unblock wizard|unblock wizard]].</small>{{pb}}

””’Can you explain, in your own words, why your edits were promotional?””'{{pb}}

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:SSVM Institutions, and I noticed that your username, “Ssvmins“, may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include “XYZ Company”, “MyWidgetsUSA.com”, and “Foobar Museum of Art”. However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as “Sara Smith at XYZ Company”, “Mark at WidgetsUSA”, or “FoobarFan87”, but not “SEO Manager at XYZ Company”.

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. –MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aydoh8 was:
The comment the reviewer left was:

This article may incorporate text from a large language model Glad your LLM is self aware.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

Aydo h8^{[what have I done now?]} 07:34, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your proposed new username” with your new username and replace the text “Your reason here” with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says “There is no global account for [username]”, the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text “Your reason here” with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ssvmins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request a review of my block. I understand that my edits relating to SSVM Institutions may have appeared promotional and that my username may have suggested representation of an organization, which I now realize conflicts with Wikipedia’s username and conflict of interest guidelines. However, my intention was to improve article content, not to advertise.

I acknowledge that I should have used the talk page and disclosed my connection more clearly instead of editing directly. I am willing to fully comply with Wikipedia’s policies going forward, including making a paid-contribution disclosure if required, proposing changes on talk pages instead of editing articles directly, and adopting a neutral username. I would like to request a username change to **LPS_Editor**.

I would appreciate the opportunity to contribute constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s rules. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ssvmins (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ssvmins (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

We’d like to see an unblock request from you, not ChatGPT. See WP:LLMAPPEAL. –MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologise for the way I edited earlier and for not fully understanding Wikipedia’s policies at the time. I now realise that my approach was not appropriate for an encyclopedia and may have caused extra work for other editors. I respect Wikipedia as a neutral, community-driven project and I am willing to learn and follow the rules carefully.

If given another chance, I will edit more cautiously, avoid topics where I have a connection, and ask for guidance when I am unsure. I have proposed the new username LPS_Editor, and I have checked that this name does not have an existing global account. I appreciate the work of Wikipedia volunteers and hope to contribute in a positive and policy-compliant way going forward. Ssvmins (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I apologize the way i edited earlier ,as i am new to Wikipedia ,the person who was using this account has left the job ,i have taken over the account incharge for maintaining the page of my organization where i am currently working with ,I came to know that my organization k-12 school’s page is prod on jan5th 2026 ,we were not aware about this ,fortunately when we checked the wiki account today we came to know that it is not existing ,we request to consider renaming the suggested name Lps _editor as username and the content we are working for organization for resubmission Ssvmins (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is highly concerning. Accounts may not be shared by multiple people or affiliated with companies. If this account has been used by multiple people, and is run and able to be accessed by multiple people, I see a realistic path to getting unblocked a difficult one. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Thanks for your response,i want to clarify that this account is soley used by me,the previously maintained person is no longer with the organization and i am personally managing this account to maintain it responsibly ,i will ensure that i will maintain the contents are neutral and fully compliant and i hope this clarifies the situation. Ssvmins (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What happens to this account if you leave the company or take different duties at the company that don’t involve editing Wikipedia? CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Ssvmins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.
Can you explain, in your own words, why your edits were promotional?
My edits were promotional because I described SSVM Institutions in a positive, detailed way that sounded like marketing rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. I included information about programs and achievements without relying enough on independent sources. Since I am connected to the institution, editing directly also created a conflict of interest. I now understand that Wikipedia requires neutral writing based on independent coverage, and in the future I will suggest changes on talk pages instead of editing directly.
What is your relationship with the subjects you have been editing about?
I am connected to SSVM Institutions in a professional capacity. Because of this connection, I understand that editing articles about the institution directly creates a conflict of interest. I should have disclosed this earlier and used the article talk page to suggest neutral, well-sourced changes instead of editing the page myself.
If you are unblocked, what topic areas will you edit in?
If I am unblocked, I plan to work on general editing where I don’t have any personal or professional connection. I can help with fixing grammar, improving formatting, adding reliable citations, and making articles clearer to read. I will stay away from editing pages related to SSVM Institutions or any organisation I’m connected with, and if needed, I will only suggest changes on the talk page following Wikipedia’s conflict of interest rules.
Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I sincerely apologise for the way I edited earlier and for not fully understanding Wikipedia’s policies at the time. I now realise that my approach was not appropriate for an encyclopedia and may have caused extra work for other editors. I respect the purpose of Wikipedia as a neutral, community-driven project and I am willing to learn and follow the rules carefully.

If given another chance, I will edit more cautiously, avoid topics where I have a connection, and take time to ask for guidance when I am unsure. I appreciate the volunteers who maintain Wikipedia and I hope to contribute in a positive and policy-compliant way going forward.
Ssvmins (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=LPS_Editor | 3=The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, why your edits were promotional? My edits were promotional because I described SSVM Institutions in a positive, detailed way that sounded like marketing rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. I included information about programs and achievements without relying enough on independent sources. Since I am connected to the institution, editing directly also created a conflict of interest. I now understand that Wikipedia requires neutral writing based on independent coverage, and in the future I will suggest changes on talk pages instead of editing directly. What is your relationship with the subjects you have been editing about? I am connected to SSVM Institutions in a professional capacity. Because of this connection, I understand that editing articles about the institution directly creates a conflict of interest. I should have disclosed this earlier and used the article talk page to suggest neutral, well-sourced changes instead of editing the page myself. If you are unblocked, what topic areas will you edit in? If I am unblocked, I plan to work on general editing where I don’t have any personal or professional connection. I can help with fixing grammar, improving formatting, adding reliable citations, and making articles clearer to read. I will stay away from editing pages related to SSVM Institutions or any organisation I’m connected with, and if needed, I will only suggest changes on the talk page following Wikipedia’s conflict of interest rules. Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I sincerely apologise for the way I edited earlier and for not fully understanding Wikipedia’s policies at the time. I now realise that my approach was not appropriate for an encyclopedia and may have caused extra work for other editors. I respect the purpose of Wikipedia as a neutral, community-driven project and I am willing to learn and follow the rules carefully.

Ssvmins (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LPS_Editor | reason=The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

I sincerely apologise for the way I edited earlier and for not fully understanding Wikipedia’s policies at the time. I now realise that my approach was not appropriate for an encyclopedia and may have caused extra work for other editors. I respect the purpose of Wikipedia as a neutral, community-driven project and I am willing to learn and follow the rules carefully.

Ssvmins (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}[reply]

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after “decline=”, a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LPS_Editor | reason=The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

I sincerely apologise for the way I edited earlier and for not fully understanding Wikipedia’s policies at the time. I now realise that my approach was not appropriate for an encyclopedia and may have caused extra work for other editors. I respect the purpose of Wikipedia as a neutral, community-driven project and I am willing to learn and follow the rules carefully.

Ssvmins (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}[reply]

More LLM. Don’t open a new unblock appeal. Instead, just paste your response here. –MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:19, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you are employed by SSVM Institutions, you are considered to be a paid editor under our rules(with regards to SSVM). What topics might you contribute about? 331dot (talk) 09:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I work for ssvm as a paid editor ,I may edit the pages of ssvm institutions related to events ,achievements i will follow the policies of wikipedia according to conflict of interest guidelines Ssvmins (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is self-contradictory. You may not edit articles related to SSVM or any other subject in which you have a conflict of interest. To do so would directly contravene our policies and COI guidelines. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thankyou for clarifying, I understand i have conflict of interest and will not edit ssvm articles directly and i will suggest the article changes to the neutral editors in the talk page for review Ssvmins (talk) 09:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment