User talk:Superboilles: Difference between revisions

 

Line 60: Line 60:

:Honestly none of these will cut it – you need independent sources (e.g. not Uni Basel where you work, but rather a newspaper) to make a profile of you (“Filippo was born this year, he did this and that”. But generally speaking it is poor form to write one’s own entry and not declare the obvious conflict of interest… [[User:Superboilles|Superboilles]] ([[User talk:Superboilles#top|talk]]) 19:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

:Honestly none of these will cut it – you need independent sources (e.g. not Uni Basel where you work, but rather a newspaper) to make a profile of you (“Filippo was born this year, he did this and that”. But generally speaking it is poor form to write one’s own entry and not declare the obvious conflict of interest… [[User:Superboilles|Superboilles]] ([[User talk:Superboilles#top|talk]]) 19:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

::Hello Superboilles, thank you for your reply and feedback. I would like to clarify that I have no personal or professional connection to the subject of the article. I do not work with or for him, and have no business interests involved. I have simply followed his work over the years. While preparing the article, I reached out to him for information and references to ensure accuracy. After your review, I forwarded some of the references I had received in the hope they might be useful for the revision. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, there are few suitable secondary sources available on this topic. On the other hand, according to WP:PROF: “Many scientists, researchers, philosophers, and other scholars (collectively referred to as “academics” for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources.” Thank you again for your time and assessment. [[User:Vz19|Vz19]] ([[User talk:Vz19|talk]]) 09:53, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

== Georges Dumitresco article cleanup ==

== Georges Dumitresco article cleanup ==

Please leave me a message

Dear Superboilles,
Thanks very much for your quick review of the draft article about the Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. I had not expected that it would be reviewed so soon and thought that I would have time to edit and add more references. I would like to add images, but for that I need to acquire the images and the permission to use them. GoneDutch (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe that once a submission is declined the draft remains in place for another 6 month or so. Images might be helpful to other entries, but from what I’ve seen there’s very little third-party substance to build an entry on. Good luck though! Superboilles (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just want to update you about Akusada and Cruz VS Cruz, both have been speedy deleted (per your request) and their draft pages could now be moved to mainspace. Thank you! Hotwiki (talk) 13:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Superboilles! Thank you for reviewing the draft and your feedback.

Please find below additional references I found about the topic:

https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/Awards-Honors/Article/Filippo-M.-Rijli-elected-to-Accademia-Nazionale-dei-Lincei.html
https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Basel-research-project-receives-5.3-million-euros.html
https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/epigenetics-behind-unique-human-faces/
https://www.myscience.ch/de/news/2023/building_face_structures_by_remote_control-2023-fmi
https://universe.unibas.ch/projects-collaborations/7645
file:///Users/filrijli/Downloads/2017-02-transcriptional-discrimination.pdf
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/783348
file:///Users/filrijli/Downloads/2013-01-epigenetic-orchestrate-neuronal-migration.pdf
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-06-corticocerebellar-neural-circuits.html
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080610092756.htm
https://www.gravita-zero.org/2010/07/esof-2010-torino-what-makes-us-humans.html

Could you please let me know whether, in your experience, (at least some of) these additional references could qualify the piece for a wikipedia article.

I appreciate your input. Thank you. Vz19 (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly none of these will cut it – you need independent sources (e.g. not Uni Basel where you work, but rather a newspaper) to make a profile of you (“Filippo was born this year, he did this and that”. But generally speaking it is poor form to write one’s own entry and not declare the obvious conflict of interest… Superboilles (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Superboilles, thank you for your reply and feedback. I would like to clarify that I have no personal or professional connection to the subject of the article. I do not work with or for him, and have no business interests involved. I have simply followed his work over the years. While preparing the article, I reached out to him for information and references to ensure accuracy. After your review, I forwarded some of the references I had received in the hope they might be useful for the revision. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, there are few suitable secondary sources available on this topic. On the other hand, according to WP:PROF: “Many scientists, researchers, philosophers, and other scholars (collectively referred to as “academics” for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources.” Thank you again for your time and assessment. Vz19 (talk) 09:53, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Superboilles,

Once again, I do appreciate and thank you for taking the time reviewing and accepting the Georges Dumitresco article.
I would be grateful if you could you please clarify the following:

1) The text that follows cited a number of references. I believe that you have removed all its references. Please explain.
“A medical doctor and a versatile artist, Georges Dumitresco contributed articles on health topics to the daily newspaper Le Nouvelliste and also illustrated the paper and its articles.”

2) The following phrase with its references mentioning the journals that published his works was entirely removed. Please explain.
“His works have been published in Romanian publications such as Memoria, revista gândirii arestate (https://www.revistamemoria.ro/) [34][35],Luceafarul[36],Literatorul[37]andRomania Libera[38].”

Thank you. Tedysh (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]