:thanks you for discuss [[User:TumCool412|TumCool412]] ([[User talk:TumCool412#top|talk]]) 08:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
:thanks you for discuss [[User:TumCool412|TumCool412]] ([[User talk:TumCool412#top|talk]]) 08:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
::It seems that you didn’t understand the issue because you did it again [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himouto!_Umaru-chan&diff=prev&oldid=1331997780 here] after being warned. Citations have nothing to do with your personal signatures. [[User:Xexerss|Xexerss]] ([[User talk:Xexerss|talk]]) 09:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
::It seems that you didn’t understand the issue because you did it again [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himouto!_Umaru-chan&diff=prev&oldid=1331997780 here] after being warned. Citations have nothing to do with your personal signatures. [[User:Xexerss|Xexerss]] ([[User talk:Xexerss|talk]]) 09:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
== Reverting edits ==
Hello TumCool412! I just wanted to ask why you are reverting your own edits. An issue was not immediately clear to me, which is why I am asking. [[User:IndigoManedWolf|IndigoManedWolf]] ([[User talk:IndigoManedWolf|talk]]) 02:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Hi TumCool412! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 16:02, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello TumCool412! Your additions to Codeine have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 11:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the “view history” tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn’t realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks so much TumCool412 (talk) 13:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi TumCool412! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Santiago and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word.
Also, World Population Review is self-published, so it is not a reliable source and should not be cited on Wikipedia. See the WP:RSN archives for more information. —Worldbruce (talk) 14:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you TumCool412 (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you’ve been adding <ref name=”Chogath Kog’sante”> across multiple articles where that reference name isn’t relevant. Please see WP:REFNAME for advice on choosing appropriate names for references, and please change the instances where you’ve used that name to ones that comply with editing guidelines. Thanks. – Eureka Lott 03:52, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much o7 TumCool412 (talk) 07:50, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Nguyen 2010 is the most common surname among Vietnamese people. right?
- Chogath Kog’sante is my signature too
- thanks you for discuss TumCool412 (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- It seems that you didn’t understand the issue because you did it again here after being warned. Citations have nothing to do with your personal signatures. Xexerss (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello TumCool412! I just wanted to ask why you are reverting your own edits. An issue was not immediately clear to me, which is why I am asking. IndigoManedWolf (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
