User talk:TW929: Difference between revisions

([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) –[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 19:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) –[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 19:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

== Endorsements ==

As per [[WP:ENDORSE]], endorsements made by organizations can be sourced to the respective organizations social media. Please re-add the removed endorsements for Stefanik and all others. Thanks! [[User:Aesurias|aesurias]] ([[User talk:Aesurias|talk]]) 03:22, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Epluribusunumyall were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs independent and secondary sources to determine notability. –

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TW929! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get USAID and CFPB are not traditional cabinet posts, but 2 things are in play here – 1. Presidents can reshuffle things in the cabinet, to their own tastes and it’s well established Trump does things a bit differently then the usual politician. 2. Rubio and Bessent took on extra duties after their confirmation, so all this does is reflect all of their roles. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t that mean that the acting director positions go in the Trump appointee article then? TW929 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No reason why not. My only point here is that guys already in the cabinet added extra duties and extra titles. As I said the cabinet article is about the people more so than the specific jobs, as the president (whoever it is) can arrange things his own way. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you’ve added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2026 United States Senate election in Maine

added a link pointing to Sun Journal

2026 United States Senate elections

added a link pointing to Sun Journal

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2025 Norman, Oklahoma mayoral election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I’m struggling to see note that pushes this solidly above Wikipedia’s notability standards.
This certainly could be covered as just a short paragraph in another article (perhaps the section on the city’s article covering its local politics). If either candidate reaches sufficient note: I can see this having a short section in an article on them.