User talk:Ulltrassai: Difference between revisions

Line 64: Line 64:

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Kravica Incident (1991)|Kravica Incident (1991)]] (December 8) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Thilio was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

* ”[[WP:Notability#General notability guideline|in-depth]]” (not just passing mentions about the subject)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|”independent”]] of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

—

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Kravica Incident (1991)]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kravica_Incident_(1991) ”’Articles for creation help desk”’], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thilio&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kravica_Incident_(1991) ”’reviewer’s talk page”’] or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Thilio| CONFUSED SPIRIT]][[User talk:Thilio|(Thilio).Talk]] 17:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Hello, I’m ChildrenWillListen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Republika Srpska without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Republika srpska has no history before 1992,and also the text is very dumb to say it,theres even that map of illyrian provinces and its saying “territory of republika srpska within the roman empire, 4th century” as if it existed at that time,there is no absolute need for **bosnian** history to be in republika srpskas page history Ulltrassai (talk) 20:49, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Republika Srpska, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this in the article talk page to gain consensus first. Do not remove anything from that article until then. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:52, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mehmed Pasha Sokolovic Turbe.png. You don’t seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image’s creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the “Edit” tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image’s description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. —ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulltrassai! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Joy (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ravno massacre, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Joy (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Operation Pećigrad ’94. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 22:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kravica Incident (1991). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ulltrassai!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Carolina2k22 • (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 17:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment