User talk:Verylongandmemorable: Difference between revisions

Line 149: Line 149:

{{DYK views|21,539|897.5|January 2026|Mount Doom (climb)}} [[User:GalliumBot|GalliumBot]] ([[User talk:GalliumBot|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GalliumBot|contribs]]) (he/[[It (pronoun)|it]]) 03:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

}}<!– Template:UpdatedDYK –>  — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 00:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

== Women in Red ==

Hi there, Verylongandmemorable, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created several women’s biographies. We now look forward to many more. In this connection, if you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through the tips in our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Ten Simple Rules for Women in Red|Ten Simple Rules]]. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!–[[User:Ipigott|Ipigott]] ([[User talk:Ipigott|talk]]) 09:12, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Verylongandmemorable! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primož Roglič, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page João Almeida. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry one of your first experiences was getting criticized by some rando for participating; I hope it doesn’t put you off. For what it’s worth, speaking as an experienced reviewer, your reviews look quite well-done, especially for a newer editor. It’s nice to see people jumping in, and GAN is one of those places where we always need more reviewers. Have fun in the backlog drive! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grrr, could you not see that I was in the middle of adding the results? Thanks anyway, Kiwipete (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I’m really sorry, I just came across the page and saw results were empty so figured I’d add it. Is there a way to see when someone else is actively editing a page? I’m genuinely sorry if there’s some wikipedia culture thing I’m missing Verylongandmemorable (talk) 01:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s alright, please excuse my (fake) anger 🙂 You can look at the page history. You would have seen that I had done a couple of edits already. Kiwipete (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yeah, I can see that. I’ll check for recent edits in the future, thanks! Verylongandmemorable (talk) 02:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Liège–Bastogne–Liège, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Remco Evenepoel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page João Almeida.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Big Four (cycling) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination’s entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Four (cycling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four (cycling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kevin McE (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Sepp Kuss is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit — Reconrabbit (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Sepp Kuss has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit — Reconrabbit (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Verylongandmemorable. Thank you for your work on Mount Doom (climb). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Clearly written and with sufficient references to satisfy notability. Perhaps a niche field, but will be of interest to many readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:55, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sepp Kuss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was … that cyclist Sepp Kuss logged 547,019 metres (1,794,682 ft) of elevation gain in 2023? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sepp Kuss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here’s how, Sepp Kuss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Verylongandmemorable. Thank you for your work on Ename Samyn Classic. Another editor, Casablanca Rock, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this! Is there any way that a mention could be added of the usage of the name Ename Samyn Classic to the Le Samyn article? All the best!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Casablanca Rock}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Casablanca 🪨^(T) 21:09, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

— Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Verylongandmemorable, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created several women’s biographies. We now look forward to many more. In this connection, if you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through the tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!–Ipigott (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply