User talk:Vsambor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Latest revision as of 19:21, 13 October 2025

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It looks like LLM / Artificial Intelligence was used to write this article, particularly the introduction. Also the sources use wikipedia as a source, which isn’t permitted under WP:NOTSOURCE, perhaps thanks to LLM. It won’t take much work to fix this, the article is actually close to being OK. This article does not need so many repeat sources of the same fact, two is usually fine. But keep the more in-depth sources since they are more useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

ChrysGalley (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate a lot your feedback. It took me a long time to gather and arrange everything for the article, which I wrote and research it myself. I’ll take Wikipedia pages down immediately because I had no idea they couldn’t be used as sources.

I added a lot of sources because someone previously mentioned to me that it’s important to add sources for every competition I mention in introduction, that’s why they are so many. But I will only keep the best one now.

I’m glad you looked into the article because I was waiting for someone to do so for almost three months. I’m prepared to make any adjustments you think are necessary. Once again, I really appreciate your assistance and help! Vsambor (talk) 19:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vsambor!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 [[User:ChrysGalley|ChrysGalley]] ([[User talk:ChrysGalley|talk]]) 15:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
+:I appreciate a lot your feedback. It took me a long time to gather and arrange everything for the article, which I wrote and research it myself. I’ll take Wikipedia pages down immediately because I had no idea they couldn’t be used as sources.
+:I added a lot of sources because someone previously mentioned to me that it’s important to add sources for every competition I mention in introduction, that’s why they are so many. But I will only keep the best one now.
+:I’m glad you looked into the article because I was waiting for someone to do so for almost three months. I’m prepared to make any adjustments you think are necessary. Once again, I really appreciate your assistance and help! [[User:Vsambor|Vsambor]] ([[User talk:Vsambor#top|talk]]) 19:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
 {| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”

Latest revision as of 19:21, 13 October 2025

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply