User:Baylakegirl/Palace of Sultan Mas’ud III/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

You will be compiling your bibliography in this sandbox.

^[1] Encyclopaedia Iranica – “Ḡaznī II. Monuments and Inscriptions”

Giunta, Roberta. “Ḡaznī II. Monuments and Inscriptions.” Encyclopaedia Iranica, edited by Ehsan Yarshater, vol. X, fasc. 4, pp. 384–388. Columbia University, 2000. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/%E1%B8%A1azni-ii-monuments-and-inscriptions/

^[2] Art Institute of Chicago – “Architectural Relief Panel with Foliage Design”

Architectural Relief Panel with Foliage Design. The Art Institute of Chicago, 1983.https://www.artic.edu/artworks/130589/architectural-relief-panel-with-foliage-design?

^[3] Smarthistory – “Dado Panel, Courtyard of the Royal Palace of Mas’ud III”

Mercuri, Elizabeth Kurtulik. “Dado Panel, Courtyard of the Royal Palace of Mas’ud III.” Smarthistory, August 8, 2015. Accessed October 20, 2025. https://smarthistory.org/dado-panel-courtyard-of-the-royal-palace-of-masud-iii/?

^[4] Rugiadi, Martina.

“Marble from the Palace of Masʿūd III in Ghazni.” In South Asian Archaeology 2007: Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the European Association of South Asian Archaeology in Ravenna, Italy, July 2007, edited by Pierfrancesco Callieri and Luca Colliva, vol. 2, Historic Periods, pp. 297–306. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2010.https://www.academia.edu/1523171/2010_Marble_from_the_palace_of_Mas_ud_III_in_Ghazni_in_Pierfrancesco_Callieri_and_Luca_Colliva_eds_Proceedings_of_the_XIX_International_Conference_on_South_Asian_Archaeology_Ravenna_2th_6th_July_2007_vol_II_Historic_Periods_Oxford_pp_297_306

^[5]

^[6]

Bibliography As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following: Is the source from a reliable publication? Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking. Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts. Is the source verifiable? In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source. Is the source independent of the subject? Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations. For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person’s webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent. Is the source primary or secondary? Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content. Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge. Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia. If you’re working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines. If you’re creating a new article, consider the following: Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you’re writing about. Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations. Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don’t count towards the notability requirement. Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully. Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you’re trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully. If you’re not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia’s sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Ali Cioffi- Bibliography

Museum With No Frontiers / IslamicArt. “Ghaznavid Dynasty (Art and Architecture).” IslamicArt – MWNF.

• A curated museum webpage that offers a comprehensive overview of Ghaznavid art and architecture, serving as a reliable secondary source for contextual and comparative analysis.

Encyclopaedia Iranica. “ḠAZNĪ ii. Monuments and Inscriptions.” Columbia University Center for Iranian Studies. Link^[7]

• Scholarly encyclopedia entry authored by field specialists, providing independent and verifiable information.

• Details the architectural layout and decorative features of the Palace of Sultan Masʿud III in Ghazni, such as courtyard design, marble panels, and Kufic inscriptions.

• Serves as an authoritative source for factual information on materials, spatial organization, and historical context.

Mousavi Haji, S. R. “A Study on the Architectural Structure of Masʿud III Palace in Ghazni.” Journal of Subcontinent Researches, 2019.

• Peer-reviewed article focusing on the architectural layout, structural system, and spatial analysis of Sultan MasʿudIII’s palace.

• Offers technical, descriptive details (plans, structural elements, comparative examples) beyond general summaries.

• Highly reliable for supporting arguments on construction methods and architectural form.

Giunta, Roberta. “Some Considerations Regarding the Attribution to Masʿūd III of the Royal Palace at Ghazni.”Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale,”Vol. 82, Issues 1–2, 2022, pp. 213–223.

• Peer-reviewed journal article analyzing archaeological and historiographic evidence for attributing the palace to Sultan Masʿud III.

• Critically examines architectural, epigraphic, and excavation data to address attribution debates.

• Valuable for discussing evidentiary uncertainties and methodology in reconstructing the palace’s history.

Rugiadi, Martina. “The Ghaznavid Marble Architectural Decoration: An Overview.” MIT Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, 2007. [PDF]

• Scholarly research from MIT analyzing marble decoration techniques, motifs, and typologies in Ghaznavid architecture.

• Provides in-depth evidence of marble panel types, decorative motifs, and their placement within palace structures.

• Independent, verifiable source useful for architectural and decorative analysis.

McClary, Richard P., ed. Stucco in the Islamic World: Studies of Architectural Ornament from Spain to India. Edinburgh University Press, 2025. JSTOR Link^[8]

• Edited scholarly volume featuring essays on stucco decoration, including a chapter on the Ghaznavid palace of Masʿud III.

• The relevant chapter discusses stucco techniques, motifs, stylistic context, and the role of ornament in Ghazni’sarchitecture.

• Reliable, academic collection useful for analyzing the decorative program and broader Islamic artistic traditions.
Robby Kenyon – Bibliography

Robby Kenyon – Bibliography

PATEL, ALKA. “Architectural Cultures and Empire: The Ghurids in Northern India (ca. 1192–1210).” Bulletin of the Asia Institute 21 (2007): 35–60.

This will help justify adding architectural context to the introduction because it shows how the late 12th-century Ghurid world is closely connected to the Ghaznavids and developed its own distinct architectural traditions shaped by regional diversity and cultural exchange. By explaining how builders in areas like the Indus Valley and northern India reused materials, integrated local styles, and adapted Islamic forms, the text demonstrates why the introduction will first outline the broader architectural environment of this period. Providing this context allows readers to better understand the Palace of Sultan Masʿud III within the evolving architectural landscape of medieval Afghanistan and northern India.

RAZA, S. JABIR. “CONSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY OF THE GHAZNAVIDS.” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 57 (1996): 877–90.

This source will support expanding the introduction because it shows the scale and details of Ghaznavid architectural activity, showing that palaces like the Sultan Masʿud III were part of much larger building tradition. By outlining the Ghaznavids’ construction of palaces, mosques, gardens, fortifications, and major public works and noting their use of marble, ornate decoration, and Abbasid artistic influences. The text reinforces why the introduction needs to explain the architectural achievements of the dynasty. Adding this context will give a clearer understanding of the technological skill, artistic ambition, and cultural identity expressed in the palace’s design.

Flood, Finbarr Barry. “Lost in Translation: Architecture, Taxonomy, and the Eastern ‘Turks.’” Muqarnas 24 (2007): 79–115.

I choose this source because it helps justify adding architectural context to the introduction because it explains how Ghaznavid architecture developed through ongoing cultural exchange with Turkic, Persian, and regional building traditions. By showing how things from this period were shaped by processes of translation and adaptation, rather than by a single, uniform style. The text supports the need to introduce the complex cultural influences behind structures like the Palace of Sultan Masʿud III. Including this background in the introduction helps readers understand the palace as part of a broader transcultural architectural environment rather than an isolated monument.

Hussain, Zainab. “PROFESSOR SUDHIR RANJAN DAS MEMORIAL PRIZE: SYMBOL OF AUTHORITY: ARCHITECTURAL STUDY OF MINAR-I-JAM AND QUTB MINAR.” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 78 (2017): 1031–40.

This source supports expanding the introduction because it illustrates how major monuments of the Ghaznavid–Ghurid period often functioned as symbolic statements of power rather than purely functional structures. By analyzing towers like the Minar-i-Jam and Qutb Minar. The text helps support the importance of explaining the cultural meaning behind architectural features in the introduction. Including this context helps readers understand that structures such as the Palace of Sultan Masʿud III were designed not only for use, but also to project authority and participate in the broader visual language of Indo-Islamic monumental architecture.

Burton-Page, John. “SULTANATE ARCHITECTURE.” In Indian Islamic Architecture: Forms and Typologies, Sites and Monuments, edited by George Michell, 20:3–25. Brill, 2008.

This source justifies adding broader architectural context to the introduction because it explains how Islamic architecture in Afghanistan and northern India was developed through a long transition from pre-Islamic building traditions to the later Sultanate styles. By showing how features, such as arches, domes, stone carving, and regional construction techniques evolved across different dynasties, the text highlights the diverse influences that shaped monuments of the Ghaznavid period. Including this information in the introduction helps readers understand that the Palace of Sultan Masʿud III emerged from a complex architectural environment, where earlier traditions and regional practices directly impacted its design and construction.

Examples: Luke, Learie. 2007. Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980 Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press. This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it’s helpful in establishing notability. Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo. 2013. “Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border”. Phytotaxa. This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it’s helpful in establishing notability. Baker, William J.; Dransfield, John 2016. “Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics”. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source for a specific fact. Since it only dedicates a few sentences to the topic, it can’t be used to establish notability.