User:Globalpitabread/Pan-Arabism/Outline: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

• So far, the article gives a clear summary of Pan-Arabism (I’ll elaborate more below)… article explains where the movement came from, its main leaders (Gamal Abdel Nasser), historical events (like the Arab Revolt) and how the movement declined. The article is easy to follow and its divided well (“Origins”, “Attempts at Arab Union”, and “Decline”) and included reliable references (like Britannica) and pictures.
• Improvements needed:
  • Egypt changed its name to the Arab Republic of Egypt in 1971 (not 1973… like stated in the article)
  • I can’t find anything about Zaki al-Arsuzi being influenced by Nazi ideology and there was no source was cited there
  • All the information in the article is outdated (the newest citation is dated 1990’s). Newer research should be included on Pan-Arabism.
  • The reference says “Google Books” should be cited properly… not just a link to the book.
  • “Different Arab leaders competed to become the leading voices for the Arab and Islamic worlds. Such competition sporadically resulted in friction between the leaders of these Arab countries.” sounds opinion-based and is broad.. should be more neutral and rewritten with actual evidence/source.

Content gaps:

• Sati’ al-Hursi should be showcased more because he played a big role in shaping Arab nationalism
• Same with the Sues Crises… there should be at least a sentence about how this increased Nasser’s popularity
• How did the 2011 Arab Spring affect Pan-Arabism?

Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it’s time to plan out how you’ll improve your assigned article. In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you’ve identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article’s quality. Consider other changes you’ll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you’ve identified will fill in a content gap.