User:Ladybug0322/Criminalization of poverty: Difference between revisions

This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution. If you’re starting a new article, you can develop it here until it’s ready to go live. If you’re working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the “Publish page” button. (It just means ‘save’; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content.

Fines and Fees

Fines in the justice system are frequently understood as the consequences for offenses such as minor traffic violations or in addition to short prison sentences. Fees, on the other hand, are the payments for access to certain services such as a phone call while in custody or for a court reporter at a hearing.^[1] Some states use fees to fund state programs, such as the Fish and Game Preservation Fund in California.^[2] If these fines and fees are not able to be paid immediately, the cost increases through the imposition of interest and late payment fees. If these debts go unpaid for long enough, many states are able to jail those who owe money. ^[1] In 2019, more than half of the people arrested and booked made less than $10,000 a year individually, meaning those with the least amount of money are fined more often.^[3]

The criminalization of poverty refers to the systemic practices and policies that disproportionately penalize individuals for behaviors associated with their economic status. This phenomenon manifests through various legal and social mechanisms that enforce penalties on those who are unable to meet basic needs due to poverty, leading to a cycle of criminalization and further marginalization. Examples include fines and fees that the person is unable to pay, anti-homelessness laws and actions, and interconnections between welfare and criminal law.

In the United States

In 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson that an ordinances that criminalized camping on public property was constitutional.

In 2025, the Fremont, California city council voted to criminalize ‘aiding’ and ‘abetting’ homeless camps. The ordinance was later revised removing the clause that could have punished those “aiding and abetting” encampments

Fines and Fees

Fines in the justice system are frequently understood as the consequences for offenses such as minor traffic violations or in addition to short prison sentences. Fees, on the other hand, are the payments for access to certain services such as a phone call while in custody or for a court reporter at a hearing.^[1] Some states use fees to fund state programs, such as the Fish and Game Preservation Fund in California.^[2] If these fines and fees are not able to be paid immediately, the cost increases through the imposition of interest and late payment fees. If these debts go unpaid for long enough, many states are able to jail those who owe money.^[1]  In 2019, more than half of the people arrested and booked made less than $10,000 a year individually, meaning those with the least amount of money are fined more often.^[3]