:{{+1}} So the deletion list doesn’t look great at first glance, but nothing since a bunch redirects at XfDs last year, while the two this year were G6 to make way for a page move. I spot checked a bunch of acronyms that looked unlikely to be mentioned at the target; they were all mentioned at the target, categorised correctly, and mostly unreviewed. [[User:CommunityNotesContributor|CNC]] ([[User talk:CommunityNotesContributor|talk]]) 12:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:{{+1}} So the deletion list doesn’t look great at first glance, but nothing since a bunch redirects at XfDs last year, while the two this year were G6 to make way for a page move. I spot checked a bunch of acronyms that looked unlikely to be mentioned at the target; they were all mentioned at the target, categorised correctly, and mostly unreviewed. [[User:CommunityNotesContributor|CNC]] ([[User talk:CommunityNotesContributor|talk]]) 12:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
===Dylanisajet99===
{{rauto|Dylanisajet99}} is a relatively new user, but has been creating many redirects. According to Xtools, none deleted so far since he joined 4 months ago. I went through spot checking and I tagged two {{tl|R to article without mention}}, but didn’t find anything objectionable. Seems like Dylan is pretty active with {{tl|R from fictional character}}. According to [[quarry:query/65652|my query]], they have over 200 unreviewed redirects at the moment. {{Courtesy ping|Dylanisajet99}} Happy Editing — ”'[[User:IAmChaos|<span style=”color:#000000″>IAm</span>]][[User talk:IAmChaos|<span style=”color:#0645AD”>Chaos</span>]]”’ 06:01, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
:So I also spot checked some of these, I found half were unreviewed because they were <nowiki>{{R to article without mention}}</nowiki> which for reference is a maintenance category that should remain empty, so in contrast I’d describe it as quite objectionable. I suspect there are lots of redirects that need to go to RfD here, ideally someone more familiar with redirects and/or fictional characters would take a look. Sorry for using words not actions here, but it’d be wise if someone more experienced took a deeper look. [[User:CommunityNotesContributor|CNC]] ([[User talk:CommunityNotesContributor|talk]]) 12:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:User Blocked as Sock <span class=”texhtml” style=”text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em;”>[[User:Destinyokhiria|<span style=”color:darkgreen;”>”’Destinyokhiria”'</span>]] [[User talk:Destinyokhiria|<span style=”color:darkgreen;”>💬</span>]]</span> 08:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
This page is for requesting the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.
The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects (usually more than 100).
Requests will generally be left open for at least 24 hours, although this is not a requirement. Administrators will consider endorsements and concerns from new page reviewers as part of their decision on whether to add a contributor to the list.
X4VIER.OneTap (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) – 135 redirects created with four of these deleted via G8, which is out of anyone’s control. All seem fine to me and it seems fine to mark as patrolled. Utopes (talk / cont) 13:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Now 149 redirects. Noting no redirects deleted since March, a month after becoming ECR for context. Great use of categories, didn’t see any issues. CNC (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Pescavelho (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi). per 1 over 300 redirects in queue. I went and spot checked from a number of days. Seems to be very active in creating alternate translations, alternate transliterations, and full names. While there are some in there I may not have thought to create, none of the ones I saw I would delete, or probably even think twice about. Only note I have is lack of rcats on ALL of the spot checked redirects. There are old CSD and RFD on thier talk page, but the newest is 10 months old, so it’s been awhile. Happy Editing — IAmChaos 05:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- +1 So the deletion list doesn’t look great at first glance, but nothing since a bunch redirects at XfDs last year, while the two this year were G6 to make way for a page move. I spot checked a bunch of acronyms that looked unlikely to be mentioned at the target; they were all mentioned at the target, categorised correctly, and mostly unreviewed. CNC (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Ophyrius (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) is a former NPR, perms removed without a cloud as it seems. Per my recent query, they have over 175 in queue. Only one deleted redirect out of >200, and it was a G6. I spot checked today, and they all seemed good. It seemed like a lot of {{R from move}}, and that makes sense, looking at xtools, 36% of his edits are page moves. 
- Conditional support per above due to request to @Sohom Datta, I’m wondering whether this pseudoright would fall under Ophyrius’ definition of
advanced PERMs
? If so, we’d probably be acting against their wishes by granting such a right. I’d support a bot reviewing their redirects up until their request, 23 October (as they haven’t been active since then), but not stay on the list if that’s possible (add and remove?). If they are no longer active, staying on the redirect auto-patrol list doesn’t help anyway. I’m assuming the bot works retrospectively, if not, then there’s probably nothing to do here. If approved to have current redirects auto-reviewed, then a note to the rights log regarding approval of redirect autopatrol would be useful, if the editor requests a return of permissions that is. CNC (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2025 (UTC)- @CommunityNotesContributor what’s the issue with advanced perms here? I don’t see anything on their userpage. Rusalkii (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii see User talk:Sohom Datta#Request. CNC (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- I see, thanks. My personal inclination is that autopatrol is for NPPs and not the holder and doesn’t affect their experience, so unless someone specifically requests we yoink autopatrol I’d feel comfortable granting it. Rusalkii (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- That’s fair, thought it was worth flagging but probably overthinking it. CNC (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- I see, thanks. My personal inclination is that autopatrol is for NPPs and not the holder and doesn’t affect their experience, so unless someone specifically requests we yoink autopatrol I’d feel comfortable granting it. Rusalkii (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii see User talk:Sohom Datta#Request. CNC (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @CommunityNotesContributor what’s the issue with advanced perms here? I don’t see anything on their userpage. Rusalkii (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Jako96 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) as of my last check, had over 170 redirects in queue. All redirect deletions were either G6 or G7 (3 of them are tagged as RfD, but were self nominated, so should have been G7 i think.) I spot checked a bunch, and while I added quite a few rcats, I didn’t find any redirects that were problematic.
- +1 Per above, only a few errors aside from recreated G6/G7. The redirects I came across were mainly {{R from incorrect name}} based and uncategorised. I’m no expert on biology, I’m assuming most of NPR isn’t either based on the number of unreviewed here (170/190), but they do appear to be plausible combination of words used at target as incorrect or alternatives. If there’s a higher bar for categorising redirects then it’d be a no, but I’m assuming that’s the not the focus here. CNC (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- My biology expertise comes from High School bio which I only ever took in Middle School, (american school system for context); but I think when I was spot checking most of the rcats I used were {{R from monotypic taxon}} and {{R to monotypic taxon}}. So if I was right in those, it makes more sense than just random words. Happy Editing — IAmChaos 22:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Easternsahara (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) A former NPR with 759 mainspace redirects/8 deletions. Only 1 R3 the others all G6. I spot-checked their pending reviews today and approved all the ones I saw. All of them had accurate rcats, I think I only added one rcat to one redirect.
- I will also add that I requested the deletion of a redirect that I accidentally created after misreading a source, thank you for this nomination though. User:Easternsaharareview this 21:41, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t consider G7s to be bad. I’m also not an admin though. Happy Editing — IAmChaos 19:07, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t love Article alerts, which is a relatively recent R3’ed cross-namespace redirect (these are very strongly discouraged). Otherwise I see no issues, and given their overall great track record I’m quite reluctant to deny on that basis, so leaving this for a second opinion. Rusalkii (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Pol098 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) I’m not myself concerned, but I’ve made a fair number of redirects which I think are uncontroversial, and it might save time for those patrolling not to check future ones. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Trusted user as a PCR. One R3 from 7 years ago, otherwise G6/G7, with one RfD as a typo. Happy Editing — IAmChaos 19:12, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
1isall (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) – 226 Redirect created with only 1 deleted which was G6, apart from that i didn’t find any redirects with issues. Destinyokhiria 💬 08:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
