Wikipedia talk:WikiProject England: Difference between revisions

 

Line 46: Line 46:

I have nominated [[House of Plantagenet]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/House of Plantagenet/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!–Template:FARMessage–> [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 04:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated [[House of Plantagenet]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/House of Plantagenet/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!–Template:FARMessage–> [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 04:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for [[Matthew Hale (jurist)]] ==

[[Matthew Hale (jurist)]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Matthew Hale (jurist)/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 20:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

This page is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Crewkerne has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Belvedere, Surrey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per a user talk page request, I have broken out Draft:Chronicon ex chronicis, one of the oldest English works, and I am specifically looking for information on the Genealogia Lindisfarorum, a genealogy reproduced as part of the book. This is outside my expertise, and I would appreciate any help with this effort. BD2412 T 01:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History of Somerset has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bury F.C. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Blunt has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

She: A History of Adventure has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:12, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quantock Hills has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated House of Plantagenet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 04:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Hale (jurist) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]