Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1930s romantic comedy films: Difference between revisions

1930s romantic comedy films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like a personal essay, and to my knowledge does not meet guidelines for a fork (WP:Content forks#Caution) 🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 22:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – we are not a website for essays. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – WP:NOT, article is not encyclopedic Gb321 (talk) 04:04, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. May also be worth noting GPTZero thinks this is 100% AI-generated. lp0 on fire () 07:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per comments and policies above. Kvinnen (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As the article itself might say, from a quick look we see that it has so many issues, not only being an essay but also being potentially AI-generated and so much more. Jokes aside, this article is from start to finish an essay written in a WP:Persuasive writing style (as I hope my examples of recurring conspicuous turns of phrase makes clear). As such, it violates WP:NOTESSAY and WP:DELREASON#14 (Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia) applies. TompaDompa (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per comments and policies cited above. The JPS^{talk to me} 00:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above —Lenticel ^(talk) 12:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTANESSAY Agnieszka653 (talk) 04:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]