From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|
*”’Keep”’: A bank with ”’35 million+ customers and a network of 2800+ branches”’ is likely to be independently notable! The article may needs to be rewritten and additional citations are required. But it is only seven months old. Coverage is poised to get bigger. No doubt the article is in terrible condition, but [[WP:BEFORE]] indicates, it’s notable enough to have a stand-alone article. This Indian bank is supported by substantial coverage and meets the criteria of [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]]. The page views of the Article in the last month is more than 4.47K [[User:Ankit231132|Ankits]] ([[User talk:Ankit231132|talk]]) 08:13, 20 December 2025 (UTC) |
*”’Keep”’: A bank with ”’35 million+ customers and a network of 2800+ branches”’ is likely to be independently notable! The article may needs to be rewritten and additional citations are required. But it is only seven months old. Coverage is poised to get bigger. No doubt the article is in terrible condition, but [[WP:BEFORE]] indicates, it’s notable enough to have a stand-alone article. This Indian bank is supported by substantial coverage and meets the criteria of [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]]. The page views of the Article in the last month is more than 4.47K [[User:Ankit231132|Ankits]] ([[User talk:Ankit231132|talk]]) 08:13, 20 December 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::{{tq|”likely to be notable.”}}, Yes, likely but not guaranteed. Notability is not [[WP:INHERENT]] based on the number of branches they have. {{tq|”it is only seven months old.”}}, Yes, another reason why it unlikely has the [[WP:CORPDEPTH]] to show notability. Most newer companies do not have such press. If you can point out the [[WP:THREE]] that meet [[WP:ORGCRIT]] I would be happy to look at them. –[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 02:53, 21 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 02:54, 21 December 2025
- Bihar Gramin Bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of dozens of Regional rural banks recently created and/or updated with large amounts of WP:LLM text. Attempted to tag but that was removed with the claim they are not LLM-generated. Looking closer, the bank fails WP:NCORP regardless of AI text. The sources are all routine announcements or churnalism. I cannot locate the type of WP:CORPDEPTH needed to show notability. Would recommend merging as an WP:ATD. Bihar Gramin Bank was created by combining Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank and Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank in May 2025. Content about Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank was already listed on this page so there was no need to create a separate WP:CFORK, especially since that entity is now defunct. CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: A bank with 35 million+ customers and a network of 2800+ branches is likely to be independently notable! The article may needs to be rewritten and additional citations are required. But it is only seven months old. Coverage is poised to get bigger. No doubt the article is in terrible condition, but WP:BEFORE indicates, it’s notable enough to have a stand-alone article. This Indian bank is supported by substantial coverage and meets the criteria of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. The page views of the Article in the last month is more than 4.47K Ankits (talk) 08:13, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
-
“likely to be notable.”
, Yes, likely but not guaranteed. Notability is not WP:INHERENT based on the number of branches they have.“it is only seven months old.”
, Yes, another reason why it unlikely has the WP:CORPDEPTH to show notability. Most newer companies do not have such press. If you can point out the WP:THREE that meet WP:ORGCRIT I would be happy to look at them. —CNMall41 (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
