Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscious quitting: Difference between revisions

Conscious quitting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established for WP:NEO to justify article that’s just a WP:DICTDEF. Perhaps could be merged to Resignation, but this isn’t something that needs a standalone page – it’s not actually a trend or real phenomenon, just a neologism that a few clickbaity websites used in articles a couple years ago without much substance. Reywas92^Talk 04:14, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. I’m not a believer in article deletion, unless it involves lies, crime or vandalism, but this one can be usefully merged elsewhere. So I agree with merging suggestion in the above comment. Storye book (talk) 08:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NEOLOGISM (and one based on a single grossly over-interpreted survey from a couple of years ago) that seems to have had a short burst of coverage in RS at the time and nothing since. My BEFORE returns this WP article, the articles it cites, blogs, and a few questionable listicle-like “articles” from dodgy business and recruiter websites. At best, we could add this one-line article to list of Gen Z slang, since that’s closer to what it actually is. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:04, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and if there is an article on “conscious starting” delete that too. there isn’t a debate here so nuke it from orbit. – Walter Ego 07:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If not a debate, there is certainly a discussion here between delete and merge. Storye book (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to what though? – Walter Ego 12:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above suggestion is to merge into Resignation, which sounds fine to me. Storye book (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]