Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabricio Bloisi: Difference between revisions

Fabricio Bloisi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source analysis does not show the person qualifies under general notability guideline. There is at most one independent, reliable source with in-depth information about this person. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:14, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table prepared by User:Bri

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
				? Unknown
“Fabricio Bloisi appointed CEO, Prosus and Naspers”. Prosus. 2024-05-17. Retrieved 2025-07-20.	from company he’s an executive of			✘ No
	Interview, not independent of subject			✘ No
	Interview, not independent of subject			✘ No
			Provides brief statement of educational certification	✘ No
			Business plans based on interview of subject; no in depth biographical detail added	✘ No
			Not in depth. 3rd party commentary on a single comment.	✘ No
“Nota de Esclarecimento: matéria publicada pela Folha de S.Paulo”. iFood (in Portuguese). 2024-02-26. Retrieved 2025-07-20.	Non-independent – from company he is or was an executive of			✘ No
			Describes a routine business transaction, adds zero significant biographical detail.	✘ No
			Paywall, but preview appears to be business strategies not biographic detail	✘ No
			Paywall, but preview appears to be speculative future business plan, not biographic detail	✘ No
“Fabricio Bloisi Named Brazil’s 2025 Person of the Year by Brazilian American Chamber of Commerce”. Prosus. 2025-02-13. Retrieved 2025-07-20.	Statement made by the business the subject is an executive of.			✘ No
Fabricio Bloisi ganha prêmio de Liderança Inovadora do Valor”. iFood (in Portuguese). 2021-10-28. Retrieved 2025-07-20.	Statement made by the business the subject is or was an executive of.			✘ No
“Fabricio Bloisi fará parte do ‘Conselhão’ da Presidência”. iFood (in Portuguese). 2023-03-14. Retrieved 2025-07-20.	Statement made by the business the subject is or was an executive of.			✘ No
			About company; not germane to biography	✘ No
			Not about subject at all, passing mention that he is CEO	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I’d like to hear more opinions from editors and a review of this impressive source assessment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:00, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The source table above is pretty much spot on… the Blomberg source was archived here [1], a rather short article, mostly about the company, not this person. The Reuters source is also very brief, I suppose it counts for notability, I’d give it credit as maybe half a source… We need at least one extensive article about this guy. The rest is pretty much as described, some passing mentions in RS, but nothing I’d use to show notability. I can’t find anything extra we can use either. Oaktree b (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Doing a WP:BEFORE search I found this Bloomberg article that is an independent reliable source that provides WP:SIGCOV [2]. The Reuters article also provides WP:SIGCOV upon my reading of it – the discussion of the subject is not trivial and “addresses the topic directly and in detail”.

I also found this Harvard Business Review podcast discussing his leadership at depth [3]. It is independent, a reliable secondary source and provides significant coverage of the subject.

I think that per WP:BASIC, multiple articles that have been labeled here as not providing significant coverage can be combined as well to help establish notability; “the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability”. There is no requirement that every source about a person needs to provide detailed biographical coverage in order for it to contribute to notability. Regardless, we can count Bloomberg, Harvard Business Review and Reuters as 3 sources to establish WP:GNG. Katzrockso (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep – generally persuaded that this subject has GNG, or qualifies under ANYBIO in the alternative. Jcgaylor (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]